- Home
- About us
- ILAC Activities
- Resources
- ILAC Publications
- ILAC Briefs
- Working Papers
- ILAC Sourcebook
- Part 2 - Tools and approaches
- Chapter 6: Introduction Part 2
- Chapter 7: Innovation histories
- Chapter 9: Culture study as a tool for change
- Chapter 12: Collaborative agreements
- Chapter 13: Facilitation as a foundation skill for ILAC
- Chapter 14: Learning alliances
- Chapter 15: Institutional histories
- Chapter 16: Engaging Scientists through Institutional Histories
- Chapter 18: Horizontal evaluation
- Chapter 19: Appreciative inquiry
- Part 3 - Cases and experiences
- Part 4 - Challenges and strategies
- About the authors
- Glossary
- References
- Part 2 - Tools and approaches
- Reports
- Journal Articles
- Newsletter
- Presentations by ILAC Team
- ILAC Library
- Tools and methods for M&E
- Appreciative inquiry
- Biophysical measurements
- Case study
- Content analysis
- Contribution analysis
- Cost-Benefit Analysis
- Creative expression
- Diaries, journals and logs
- Dreams realised or visioning
- Expert review
- GIS mapping
- Graphing results
- Group assessment
- Historical trends and timelines
- Horizontal evaluation
- Impact evaluation
- Benefit-cost methods
- Case studies
- Cost-effectiveness analysis
- Counterfactual Impact Evaluation (CIE)
- Difference-in-difference
- Econometric methods
- Ex-post comparison of project beneficiaries with a control group
- Instrumental variables
- Integrated partial indicators
- Mathematical programming
- Modified peer review
- Partial indicators of impact
- Patent analysis
- Pipeline comparison
- Production function approach
- Propensity score matching
- Quasi-experimental design, involving the use of matched control and project groups
- Randomization
- Rapid assessment or review, conducted ex post
- Regression discontinuity design
- Simulation method
- User surveys
- Impact flow diagram
- Innovation histories
- Institutional history
- Institutional linkage diagram
- Interviews
- Learning alliances
- Learning-oriented evaluation
- M&E Frameworks
- M&E wheel (or "spider web")
- Mapping (sketch)
- Matrix scoring
- Most significant change
- Net-Map
- Non-random sampling
- Observation
- Outcome mapping
- Participatory Impact Pathways Analysis
- Participatory methods
- Performance indicators
- Photographs and video
- Problem and objectives trees
- Random sampling
- Ranking and pocket charts
- Rapid appraisal methods
- Relative scales or ladders
- Rich pictures (or mind maps)
- SWOT
- Seasonal calendars
- Semantic differentials
- Social mapping or well-being ranking
- Sociograms
- Stakeholder analysis
- Survey
- Systems (or inputs-outputs) diagram
- Theory-Based Evaluation
- Transects
- Evaluation studies and reports
- Evaluating capacity development
- Partnership
- Seminars
- Video Room
- Links to other sites
- E-learning courses
- ILAC Publications
- Contact
- Blog
Cristina Sette's blog
Mon, 02/14/2011 - 10:04 — Cristina Sette
Very good article by Robert Chambers exploring paradigms in international development.
Mon, 01/16/2012 - 13:14 — Cristina Sette
Through the Global Forum on Agricultural Research (GFAR), an inventory by means of electronic media is now being launched. This inventory aims to identify and record forward-thinking activities that have been developed, in a systematic and documented way, on issues related to agriculture, rural development and farming systems for the next 10-20 years.
This inventory should help identify a) individuals and organizations that are or have recently been engaged in such forward-thinking activities and b) what future scenarios were envisaged. It is open to anyone who has engaged in this type of activity over the past five years. It is produced in seven languages (Arabic, Chinese, English, French, Portuguese, Russian and Spanish) to provide an opportunity for more people to participate.
Thu, 05/19/2011 - 09:40 — Cristina Sette
What Do We Mean by Poverty Alleviation?
Presentation by Javier Ekboir, ILAC Coordinator
27 April 2010
Rome, Italy
Part I: What Does Poverty Alleviation Really Mean?
Wed, 04/21/2010 - 13:23 — Cristina Sette
During the First Global Conference on Agricultural Research for Development (GCARD) in March, 2010, a very important point, among others, was raised. The "need to map the different capabilities of different partners to strengthen (cross-sector) partnerships".
A quick interaction with colleagues in the area of knowledge management brought a series of interesting views to the topic:
- - application of stakeholder analysis (Stakeholder analysis guidelines by Kammi Schmeer http://new.paho.org/hss/documents/policytoolkitforstrengtheninghealthsec...)
- - qualitative mapping approach (http://netmap.wordpress.com)
What are your views/experience with methods/tools for mapping partners capabilities? Share your thoughts here.
Wed, 07/30/2008 - 13:12 — Cristina Sette
Dear ILAC Learners:
The Standing Panel on Impact Assessment of the CGIAR Science Council has contracted Leslie Cooksy to do a scoping study on the use of ex-post impact assessment for purposes of learning and program improvement. Leslie is a professional evaluator from the US who has collaborated in the past with some evaluation work of the Science Council. She just sent me this message to me, and I thought it would be a good idea to stimulate some discussion within our group by requesting YOUR inputs on the definition of "institutional learning." The results will be of use not only to Leslie but to us as a "learning group."
Please send me your quick reactions to Leslie's definition below, and I'll prepare a response to Leslie that reflects your thoughts. I'll circulate the consolidated response as well to all of you.
Thanks in advance.
Doug
Begin forwarded message:
Wed, 07/30/2008 - 12:54 — Cristina Sette
Dear colleagues: