- Home
- About us
- ILAC Activities
- Resources
- ILAC Publications
- ILAC Briefs
- ILAC Sourcebook
- Part 2 - Tools and approaches
- Chapter 6: Introduction Part 2
- Chapter 7: Innovation histories
- Chapter 9: Culture study as a tool for change
- Chapter 12: Collaborative agreements
- Chapter 13: Facilitation as a foundation skill for ILAC
- Chapter 14: Learning alliances
- Chapter 15: Institutional histories
- Chapter 16: Engaging Scientists through Institutional Histories
- Chapter 18: Horizontal evaluation
- Chapter 19: Appreciative inquiry
- Part 3 - Cases and experiences
- Part 4 - Challenges and strategies
- About the authors
- Glossary
- References
- Part 2 - Tools and approaches
- Presentations by ILAC Team
- Working Papers
- Journal Articles
- Newsletter
- Reports
- ILAC Library
- Tools and methods for M&E
- Appreciative inquiry
- Biophysical measurements
- Case study
- Content analysis
- Contribution analysis
- Cost-Benefit Analysis
- Creative expression
- Diaries, journals and logs
- Dreams realised or visioning
- Expert review
- GIS mapping
- Graphing results
- Group assessment
- Historical trends and timelines
- Horizontal evaluation
- Impact evaluation
- Benefit-cost methods
- Case studies
- Cost-effectiveness analysis
- Counterfactual Impact Evaluation (CIE)
- Difference-in-difference
- Econometric methods
- Ex-post comparison of project beneficiaries with a control group
- Instrumental variables
- Integrated partial indicators
- Mathematical programming
- Modified peer review
- Partial indicators of impact
- Patent analysis
- Pipeline comparison
- Production function approach
- Propensity score matching
- Quasi-experimental design, involving the use of matched control and project groups
- Randomization
- Rapid assessment or review, conducted ex post
- Regression discontinuity design
- Simulation method
- User surveys
- Impact flow diagram
- Innovation histories
- Institutional history
- Institutional linkage diagram
- Interviews
- Learning alliances
- Learning-oriented evaluation
- M&E Frameworks
- M&E wheel (or "spider web")
- Mapping (sketch)
- Matrix scoring
- Most significant change
- Net-Map
- Non-random sampling
- Observation
- Outcome mapping
- Participatory Impact Pathways Analysis
- Participatory methods
- Performance indicators
- Photographs and video
- Problem and objectives trees
- Random sampling
- Ranking and pocket charts
- Rapid appraisal methods
- Relative scales or ladders
- Rich pictures (or mind maps)
- SWOT
- Seasonal calendars
- Semantic differentials
- Social mapping or well-being ranking
- Sociograms
- Stakeholder analysis
- Survey
- Systems (or inputs-outputs) diagram
- Theory-Based Evaluation
- Transects
- Evaluation studies and reports
- Evaluating capacity development
- Partnership
- Seminars
- Video Room
- Links to other sites
- E-learning courses
- ILAC Publications
- Contact
- Blog
CGIAR Center-Civil Society Organizations Partnerships: Report of Six Case Studies
Sun, 08/31/2008 - 12:52 — Cristina Sette
Publication Type:
MiscellaneousSource:
CGIAR Science Council (2007)Keywords:
CGIAR; CSO; partnershipAbstract:
In 1995 the Centers supported by the CGIAR recognized linkages with Civil Society Organizations (CSOs) as imperative to a fully effective CGIAR system. A decade later, a survey of CGIAR Center collaboration found that although 17% of Centers' collaborators are CSOs, Centers rarely consider them ?highly relevant?. To shed light on the paradox revealed in the 2005 survey, and to better understand the organization, development and impact that Center-CSO partnerships have had in mobilizing science, the CGIAR Science Council commissioned a study that looked at six partnership projects between CSOs and CGIAR Centers. This report presents key insights and a lesson learned from the analysis, and attempts to show how partnerships of this nature might best be organized and supported in the future.The partnerships studied encompass many CGIAR Centers, environments, technologies and developmental needs. From Papa Andina's demand-led methodologies, to PETRRA's support and development of complex research partnerships, to ICRISAT's or IWMI's focus on community-level innovation, all the partnerships, to varying degrees, articulate need, deliver technologies, develop innovative methodologies and build capacities, trust and the networks that increasingly border CGIAR Centers. However, partnerships are also developing other, sometimes unforeseen outcomes, including giving insight into institutional innovation, building capacity in NARS and NGO partners, developing international public goods (IPGs) such as methodological insights into demand-led research, and gearing CGIAR Centers towards more 'innovation systems' thinking.
Sublibrary:
Partnership
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page