- Home
- About us
- ILAC Activities
- Resources
- ILAC Publications
- ILAC Briefs
- Working Papers
- ILAC Sourcebook
- Part 2 - Tools and approaches
- Chapter 6: Introduction Part 2
- Chapter 7: Innovation histories
- Chapter 9: Culture study as a tool for change
- Chapter 12: Collaborative agreements
- Chapter 13: Facilitation as a foundation skill for ILAC
- Chapter 14: Learning alliances
- Chapter 15: Institutional histories
- Chapter 16: Engaging Scientists through Institutional Histories
- Chapter 18: Horizontal evaluation
- Chapter 19: Appreciative inquiry
- Part 3 - Cases and experiences
- Part 4 - Challenges and strategies
- About the authors
- Glossary
- References
- Part 2 - Tools and approaches
- Reports
- Journal Articles
- Newsletter
- Presentations by ILAC Team
- ILAC Library
- Tools and methods for M&E
- Appreciative inquiry
- Biophysical measurements
- Case study
- Content analysis
- Contribution analysis
- Cost-Benefit Analysis
- Creative expression
- Diaries, journals and logs
- Dreams realised or visioning
- Expert review
- GIS mapping
- Graphing results
- Group assessment
- Historical trends and timelines
- Horizontal evaluation
- Impact evaluation
- Benefit-cost methods
- Case studies
- Cost-effectiveness analysis
- Counterfactual Impact Evaluation (CIE)
- Difference-in-difference
- Econometric methods
- Ex-post comparison of project beneficiaries with a control group
- Instrumental variables
- Integrated partial indicators
- Mathematical programming
- Modified peer review
- Partial indicators of impact
- Patent analysis
- Pipeline comparison
- Production function approach
- Propensity score matching
- Quasi-experimental design, involving the use of matched control and project groups
- Randomization
- Rapid assessment or review, conducted ex post
- Regression discontinuity design
- Simulation method
- User surveys
- Impact flow diagram
- Innovation histories
- Institutional history
- Institutional linkage diagram
- Interviews
- Learning alliances
- Learning-oriented evaluation
- M&E Frameworks
- M&E wheel (or "spider web")
- Mapping (sketch)
- Matrix scoring
- Most significant change
- Net-Map
- Non-random sampling
- Observation
- Outcome mapping
- Participatory Impact Pathways Analysis
- Participatory methods
- Performance indicators
- Photographs and video
- Problem and objectives trees
- Random sampling
- Ranking and pocket charts
- Rapid appraisal methods
- Relative scales or ladders
- Rich pictures (or mind maps)
- SWOT
- Seasonal calendars
- Semantic differentials
- Social mapping or well-being ranking
- Sociograms
- Stakeholder analysis
- Survey
- Systems (or inputs-outputs) diagram
- Theory-Based Evaluation
- Transects
- Evaluation studies and reports
- Evaluating capacity development
- Partnership
- Seminars
- Video Room
- Links to other sites
- E-learning courses
- ILAC Publications
- Contact
- Blog
The challenges of facilitating meetings
Tue, 11/25/2008 - 15:36 — Cristina Sette
What are the challenges you face when facilitating meetings?
Here are some of the challenges I face:
- run out of time
- keeping the agenda and objectives in the participant's mind
- some participants rush to make decisions
- participants don't want to participate
- when one or two participants take over the discussion
- participants checking their emails or doing their work during the meeting
- not knowing the entire background of the project before the meeting (trying to catch the hiden issues on spot)
- dealing with conflicts (when the person in charge has different objectives/views than the participants)
What other challenges do you face? And what do you do?
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
I agree with the List
I agree with the List Cristina has started with.
In addition, in the process of trying to be flexible to allow the participants to be comfortable with the setting, the objective and allow them room to indicate their interests, you can easily digress from the agenda with its effective setting planned in advance.
Along this is when a facilitating team (in the middle of a meeting session!!) does not agree on the process and the way the session should proceed. You cannot openly dis-agree but you are not comfortable what is agreed as the way forward.
But the biggest challenge I face is how to keep everyone involved in discussions and decision-making, especially in pleneary session. Or at least letting everyone realize it is their activitiy and the more they get interested and involved, the more effective the final outputs.
I will share more glitches and how I try to resolve them soon.
Thanks,
Julius, Innovation Works, ILRI