- Home
- About us
- ILAC Activities
- Resources
- ILAC Publications
- ILAC Briefs
- ILAC Sourcebook
- Acknowledgement
- About the Sourcebook
- Acronyms
- Part 1 - Introduction and overview
- Part 2 - Tools and approaches
- Chapter 6: Introduction Part 2
- Chapter 7: Innovation histories
- Chapter 9: Culture study as a tool for change
- Chapter 12: Collaborative agreements
- Chapter 13: Facilitation as a foundation skill for ILAC
- Chapter 14: Learning alliances
- Chapter 15: Institutional histories
- Chapter 16: Engaging Scientists through Institutional Histories
- Chapter 18: Horizontal evaluation
- Chapter 19: Appreciative inquiry
- Part 3 - Cases and experiences
- Part 4 - Challenges and strategies
- About the authors
- Glossary
- References
- Working Papers
- Journal Articles
- Newsletter
- Reports
- ILAC Library
- Tools and methods for M&E
- Appreciative inquiry
- Biophysical measurements
- Case study
- Content analysis
- Contribution analysis
- Cost-Benefit Analysis
- Creative expression
- Diaries, journals and logs
- Dreams realised or visioning
- Expert review
- GIS mapping
- Graphing results
- Group assessment
- Historical trends and timelines
- Horizontal evaluation
- Impact evaluation
- Benefit-cost methods
- Case studies
- Cost-effectiveness analysis
- Counterfactual Impact Evaluation (CIE)
- Difference-in-difference
- Econometric methods
- Ex-post comparison of project beneficiaries with a control group
- Instrumental variables
- Integrated partial indicators
- Mathematical programming
- Modified peer review
- Partial indicators of impact
- Patent analysis
- Pipeline comparison
- Production function approach
- Propensity score matching
- Quasi-experimental design, involving the use of matched control and project groups
- Randomization
- Rapid assessment or review, conducted ex post
- Regression discontinuity design
- Simulation method
- User surveys
- Impact flow diagram
- Innovation histories
- Institutional history
- Institutional linkage diagram
- Interviews
- Learning alliances
- Learning-oriented evaluation
- M&E Frameworks
- M&E wheel (or "spider web")
- Mapping (sketch)
- Matrix scoring
- Most significant change
- Net-Map
- Non-random sampling
- Observation
- Outcome mapping
- Participatory Impact Pathways Analysis
- Participatory methods
- Performance indicators
- Photographs and video
- Problem and objectives trees
- Random sampling
- Ranking and pocket charts
- Rapid appraisal methods
- Relative scales or ladders
- Rich pictures (or mind maps)
- SWOT
- Seasonal calendars
- Semantic differentials
- Social mapping or well-being ranking
- Sociograms
- Stakeholder analysis
- Survey
- Systems (or inputs-outputs) diagram
- Theory-Based Evaluation
- Transects
- Evaluation studies and reports
- Evaluating capacity development
- Partnership
- Seminars
- Video Room
- Links to other sites
- E-learning courses
- ILAC Publications
- Contact
- Blog
Conceptual and Methodological Developments in Innovation
Sun, 08/31/2008 - 13:52 — Cristina Sette
Publication Type:
Conference ProceedingsSource:
Innovation Africa Symposium, Wageningen University, Kampala, Uganda (2006)Keywords:
agricultural treadmill; diffusion; FFS; indigenous knowledge; Innovation; innovation of innovation; innovation systems; Resource-poor farmersAbstract:
In this paper, I use an autobiographical approach to tell the story of innovation and its changing fortunes and uses. I have lived through the major approaches and perspectives in the past 50 years and have played some role in them myself. The paper starts off with my early days with the diffusion of innovations and the agricultural treadmill in the Mid-West of the US where those theories emerged and became dominant. I then turn those ideas around by reporting on my involvement in a test of a not-for-profit marketing approach to innovation in Kenya that featured Innovating Laggards. A further turn-about occurred when indigenous knowledge and endogenous development became key dimensions of innovation. Farmers are the experts. I became closely familiar with attempts to foster innovation through collaboration between farmers and scientists in Participatory Technology Development. My work on agricultural knowledge and innovation systems (AKIS) made me sensitive to the Farmer Field School and Landcare. Both practically operationalised the idea, that innovation emerges from interaction among stakeholders. I end the paper with reporting on the Convergence of Sciences (CoS) Programme in which I am a member of the Scientific Coordination Committee. During its first phase, CoS established a pathway for an agricultural science that can improve the livelihoods of resource-poor farmers. But that phase also showed that technical innovation within very small windows of opportunity can only have limited impact. It further demonstrated the need for, and possibility of, institutional development. This finding allowed us in CoS2 to focus on innovation systems as an approach to institutional development that stretches the windows of opportunity for small-scale farmers.
Sublibrary:
Innovation