- Home
- About us
- ILAC Activities
- Resources
- ILAC Publications
- ILAC Briefs
- ILAC Sourcebook
- Part 2 - Tools and approaches
- Chapter 6: Introduction Part 2
- Chapter 7: Innovation histories
- Chapter 9: Culture study as a tool for change
- Chapter 12: Collaborative agreements
- Chapter 13: Facilitation as a foundation skill for ILAC
- Chapter 14: Learning alliances
- Chapter 15: Institutional histories
- Chapter 16: Engaging Scientists through Institutional Histories
- Chapter 18: Horizontal evaluation
- Chapter 19: Appreciative inquiry
- Part 3 - Cases and experiences
- Part 4 - Challenges and strategies
- About the authors
- Glossary
- References
- Part 2 - Tools and approaches
- Presentations by ILAC Team
- Working Papers
- Journal Articles
- Newsletter
- Reports
- ILAC Library
- Tools and methods for M&E
- Appreciative inquiry
- Biophysical measurements
- Case study
- Content analysis
- Contribution analysis
- Cost-Benefit Analysis
- Creative expression
- Diaries, journals and logs
- Dreams realised or visioning
- Expert review
- GIS mapping
- Graphing results
- Group assessment
- Historical trends and timelines
- Horizontal evaluation
- Impact evaluation
- Benefit-cost methods
- Case studies
- Cost-effectiveness analysis
- Counterfactual Impact Evaluation (CIE)
- Difference-in-difference
- Econometric methods
- Ex-post comparison of project beneficiaries with a control group
- Instrumental variables
- Integrated partial indicators
- Mathematical programming
- Modified peer review
- Partial indicators of impact
- Patent analysis
- Pipeline comparison
- Production function approach
- Propensity score matching
- Quasi-experimental design, involving the use of matched control and project groups
- Randomization
- Rapid assessment or review, conducted ex post
- Regression discontinuity design
- Simulation method
- User surveys
- Impact flow diagram
- Innovation histories
- Institutional history
- Institutional linkage diagram
- Interviews
- Learning alliances
- Learning-oriented evaluation
- M&E Frameworks
- M&E wheel (or "spider web")
- Mapping (sketch)
- Matrix scoring
- Most significant change
- Net-Map
- Non-random sampling
- Observation
- Outcome mapping
- Participatory Impact Pathways Analysis
- Participatory methods
- Performance indicators
- Photographs and video
- Problem and objectives trees
- Random sampling
- Ranking and pocket charts
- Rapid appraisal methods
- Relative scales or ladders
- Rich pictures (or mind maps)
- SWOT
- Seasonal calendars
- Semantic differentials
- Social mapping or well-being ranking
- Sociograms
- Stakeholder analysis
- Survey
- Systems (or inputs-outputs) diagram
- Theory-Based Evaluation
- Transects
- Evaluation studies and reports
- Evaluating capacity development
- Partnership
- Seminars
- Video Room
- Links to other sites
- E-learning courses
- ILAC Publications
- Contact
- Blog
Enhancing Partnerships for Enabling Rural Innovation in Africa: Challenges and prospects for institutionalizing Innovation Partnerships
Sun, 08/31/2008 - 12:52 — Cristina Sette
Publication Type:
Conference ProceedingsSource:
Innovation Africa Symposium, Kampala, Uganda (2006)Keywords:
Africa.; after-action-review; Evaluation; Innovation; participatory research; partnership; partnerships; rural innovation; scaling up; social capitalAbstract:
Despite increasing interest and support for multi-stakeholder partnerships, examples of successful partnerships are either uncommon or undocumented. There is also a dearth of simple tools and approaches that enable research and development organisations to benchmark the status of their partnerships, assess their effectiveness and performance, and to reflect on their experiences and lessons in partnerships. This paper applied the After Action Review (AAR) and peer assist, two innovative techniques to facilitate collective reflection and analysis of experiences with partnerships based on the key elements for success and challenges of maintaining and institutionalizing effective partnerships. Results highlight the dynamic process of partnership formation and the key elements that contribute to their success. These include: (i) shared vision and complementarity, (ii) consistent support from senior leadership; (iii) evidence of institutional and individual benefits; (iv) investments in human and social capital; (v) and joint resources mobilization and sharing. However, institutionalizing partnerships requires creative strategies for coping with high staff turnover and over-commitment, conflicting personalities and institutional differences, and transaction costs. The paper suggests that AAR and Peer Assist techniques can be extremely valuable tools when combined with well grounded qualitative analytical methods and rigourous quantitative analyses to strengthen the robustness of the results.
Sublibrary:
Innovation
Partnership
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page