- Home
- About us
- ILAC Activities
- Resources
- ILAC Publications
- ILAC Briefs
- ILAC Sourcebook
- Part 2 - Tools and approaches
- Chapter 6: Introduction Part 2
- Chapter 7: Innovation histories
- Chapter 9: Culture study as a tool for change
- Chapter 12: Collaborative agreements
- Chapter 13: Facilitation as a foundation skill for ILAC
- Chapter 14: Learning alliances
- Chapter 15: Institutional histories
- Chapter 16: Engaging Scientists through Institutional Histories
- Chapter 18: Horizontal evaluation
- Chapter 19: Appreciative inquiry
- Part 3 - Cases and experiences
- Part 4 - Challenges and strategies
- About the authors
- Glossary
- References
- Part 2 - Tools and approaches
- Presentations by ILAC Team
- Working Papers
- Journal Articles
- Newsletter
- Reports
- ILAC Library
- Tools and methods for M&E
- Appreciative inquiry
- Biophysical measurements
- Case study
- Content analysis
- Contribution analysis
- Cost-Benefit Analysis
- Creative expression
- Diaries, journals and logs
- Dreams realised or visioning
- Expert review
- GIS mapping
- Graphing results
- Group assessment
- Historical trends and timelines
- Horizontal evaluation
- Impact evaluation
- Benefit-cost methods
- Case studies
- Cost-effectiveness analysis
- Counterfactual Impact Evaluation (CIE)
- Difference-in-difference
- Econometric methods
- Ex-post comparison of project beneficiaries with a control group
- Instrumental variables
- Integrated partial indicators
- Mathematical programming
- Modified peer review
- Partial indicators of impact
- Patent analysis
- Pipeline comparison
- Production function approach
- Propensity score matching
- Quasi-experimental design, involving the use of matched control and project groups
- Randomization
- Rapid assessment or review, conducted ex post
- Regression discontinuity design
- Simulation method
- User surveys
- Impact flow diagram
- Innovation histories
- Institutional history
- Institutional linkage diagram
- Interviews
- Learning alliances
- Learning-oriented evaluation
- M&E Frameworks
- M&E wheel (or "spider web")
- Mapping (sketch)
- Matrix scoring
- Most significant change
- Net-Map
- Non-random sampling
- Observation
- Outcome mapping
- Participatory Impact Pathways Analysis
- Participatory methods
- Performance indicators
- Photographs and video
- Problem and objectives trees
- Random sampling
- Ranking and pocket charts
- Rapid appraisal methods
- Relative scales or ladders
- Rich pictures (or mind maps)
- SWOT
- Seasonal calendars
- Semantic differentials
- Social mapping or well-being ranking
- Sociograms
- Stakeholder analysis
- Survey
- Systems (or inputs-outputs) diagram
- Theory-Based Evaluation
- Transects
- Evaluation studies and reports
- Evaluating capacity development
- Partnership
- Seminars
- Video Room
- Links to other sites
- E-learning courses
- ILAC Publications
- Contact
- Blog
Facilitating pro-poor market chain innovation: An assessment of the participatory market chain approach in Uganda
Sun, 08/31/2008 - 12:52 — Cristina Sette
Publication Type:
MiscellaneousSource:
Working Paper No. 2008 - 1, International Potato Center (CIP), Lima, Peru (2008)Abstract:
The Participatory Market Chain Approach (PMCA) was developed by the Papa Andina Regional Initiative of the International Potato Center (CIP) to improve the competitiveness of potato market chains and small potato producers in the Andean region of South America. Beginning in 2005, CIP and Papa Andina partnered with the Regional Potato and Sweetpotato Improvement Network in Eastern and Central Africa (PRAPACE) and several local research and development (R&D) organizations to introduce the approach into Uganda and apply it in the commodity chains for potatoes, sweetpotatoes, and vegetables. The study reported on here was conducted to assess the process of introducing the PMCA into Uganda and the results to date, to assess the prospects for future use of the PMCA in Uganda and elsewhere in the region, and to identify essential elements of a strategy for introducing the PMCA into new settings. The overall conclusion is that the PMCA has proven effective in Uganda for strengthening innovation capacity and for developing market chain innovations that benefit small farmers as well as other market chain actors. Valuable capacities for innovation have been developed, particularly in the realms of knowledge, attitudes, skills, and social capital. These new capacities are potentially valuable assets for stimulating future innovations in market chains in Uganda or in other countries of the region. The application and results of the PMCA to date have stimulated considerable interest in the approach in Ugandan R&D organizations, in policy circles, and among those market chain actors who have participated in or heard about the work. Yet, follow-up work is needed to ensure that prototype innovations are adequately refined and to consolidate the multi-stakeholder platforms and social capital created. Based on the experiences assessed, it is concluded that the PMCA has potential value as a means to stimulate pro-poor innovation in Uganda and in other countries of the region. Key elements of a strategy for introducing the PMCA into new settings are identified.
Sublibrary:
Evaluation
Innovation
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page