- Home
- About us
- ILAC Activities
- Resources
- ILAC Publications
- ILAC Briefs
- ILAC Sourcebook
- Part 2 - Tools and approaches
- Chapter 6: Introduction Part 2
- Chapter 7: Innovation histories
- Chapter 9: Culture study as a tool for change
- Chapter 12: Collaborative agreements
- Chapter 13: Facilitation as a foundation skill for ILAC
- Chapter 14: Learning alliances
- Chapter 15: Institutional histories
- Chapter 16: Engaging Scientists through Institutional Histories
- Chapter 18: Horizontal evaluation
- Chapter 19: Appreciative inquiry
- Part 3 - Cases and experiences
- Part 4 - Challenges and strategies
- About the authors
- Glossary
- References
- Part 2 - Tools and approaches
- Presentations by ILAC Team
- Working Papers
- Journal Articles
- Newsletter
- Reports
- ILAC Library
- Tools and methods for M&E
- Appreciative inquiry
- Biophysical measurements
- Case study
- Content analysis
- Contribution analysis
- Cost-Benefit Analysis
- Creative expression
- Diaries, journals and logs
- Dreams realised or visioning
- Expert review
- GIS mapping
- Graphing results
- Group assessment
- Historical trends and timelines
- Horizontal evaluation
- Impact evaluation
- Benefit-cost methods
- Case studies
- Cost-effectiveness analysis
- Counterfactual Impact Evaluation (CIE)
- Difference-in-difference
- Econometric methods
- Ex-post comparison of project beneficiaries with a control group
- Instrumental variables
- Integrated partial indicators
- Mathematical programming
- Modified peer review
- Partial indicators of impact
- Patent analysis
- Pipeline comparison
- Production function approach
- Propensity score matching
- Quasi-experimental design, involving the use of matched control and project groups
- Randomization
- Rapid assessment or review, conducted ex post
- Regression discontinuity design
- Simulation method
- User surveys
- Impact flow diagram
- Innovation histories
- Institutional history
- Institutional linkage diagram
- Interviews
- Learning alliances
- Learning-oriented evaluation
- M&E Frameworks
- M&E wheel (or "spider web")
- Mapping (sketch)
- Matrix scoring
- Most significant change
- Net-Map
- Non-random sampling
- Observation
- Outcome mapping
- Participatory Impact Pathways Analysis
- Participatory methods
- Performance indicators
- Photographs and video
- Problem and objectives trees
- Random sampling
- Ranking and pocket charts
- Rapid appraisal methods
- Relative scales or ladders
- Rich pictures (or mind maps)
- SWOT
- Seasonal calendars
- Semantic differentials
- Social mapping or well-being ranking
- Sociograms
- Stakeholder analysis
- Survey
- Systems (or inputs-outputs) diagram
- Theory-Based Evaluation
- Transects
- Evaluation studies and reports
- Evaluating capacity development
- Partnership
- Seminars
- Video Room
- Links to other sites
- E-learning courses
- ILAC Publications
- Contact
- Blog
The Future of Partnerships in the CGIAR
Thu, 08/13/2009 - 12:14 — Cristina Sette
Publication Type:
MiscellaneousSource:
CGIAR (2008)Keywords:
CGIAR; ILAC Newsletter; Impact; Learning; Outcome; partnership; policyAbstract:
Creating partnerships is crucial for the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR) to reposition itself within the emerging global agricultural research and knowledge system. As part of the Change Management Process initiated by the CGIAR Members to examine the current role and situation of the CGIAR System, Working Group (WG) 2 has drawn on various studies, as well as the expertise of its members, to develop proposals for establishing successful partnerships. Building on the new visioning elements proposed by WG1, this report reviews past and current partnerships with the CGIAR to identify gaps and problem areas, and proposes ways to address these issues in the immediate and long-term future. Viewing partnerships from three perspectives – namely repositioning CGIAR in this rapidly evolving context, the importance of stakeholder consultation, and the CGIAR as a research for development and knowledge management organization – WG2 outlines the framework required for a partnership policy. This includes general principles and operational guidelines, identifying areas that need new or strengthened partnerships, the creation of a Partnership/Development Panel and incentive policies. Finally, WG2 puts forth five recommendations based on the conclusions drawn from the above, and identifies the implications of these proposals for CGIAR governance and
funding mechanisms.
Notes:
Report of Working Group 2 (Partnerships) to the Change Steering Team of the CGIAR
Sublibrary:
Partnership
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page