- Home
- About us
- ILAC Activities
- Resources
- ILAC Publications
- ILAC Briefs
- ILAC Sourcebook
- Part 2 - Tools and approaches
- Chapter 6: Introduction Part 2
- Chapter 7: Innovation histories
- Chapter 9: Culture study as a tool for change
- Chapter 12: Collaborative agreements
- Chapter 13: Facilitation as a foundation skill for ILAC
- Chapter 14: Learning alliances
- Chapter 15: Institutional histories
- Chapter 16: Engaging Scientists through Institutional Histories
- Chapter 18: Horizontal evaluation
- Chapter 19: Appreciative inquiry
- Part 3 - Cases and experiences
- Part 4 - Challenges and strategies
- About the authors
- Glossary
- References
- Part 2 - Tools and approaches
- Presentations by ILAC Team
- Working Papers
- Journal Articles
- Newsletter
- Reports
- ILAC Library
- Tools and methods for M&E
- Appreciative inquiry
- Biophysical measurements
- Case study
- Content analysis
- Contribution analysis
- Cost-Benefit Analysis
- Creative expression
- Diaries, journals and logs
- Dreams realised or visioning
- Expert review
- GIS mapping
- Graphing results
- Group assessment
- Historical trends and timelines
- Horizontal evaluation
- Impact evaluation
- Benefit-cost methods
- Case studies
- Cost-effectiveness analysis
- Counterfactual Impact Evaluation (CIE)
- Difference-in-difference
- Econometric methods
- Ex-post comparison of project beneficiaries with a control group
- Instrumental variables
- Integrated partial indicators
- Mathematical programming
- Modified peer review
- Partial indicators of impact
- Patent analysis
- Pipeline comparison
- Production function approach
- Propensity score matching
- Quasi-experimental design, involving the use of matched control and project groups
- Randomization
- Rapid assessment or review, conducted ex post
- Regression discontinuity design
- Simulation method
- User surveys
- Impact flow diagram
- Innovation histories
- Institutional history
- Institutional linkage diagram
- Interviews
- Learning alliances
- Learning-oriented evaluation
- M&E Frameworks
- M&E wheel (or "spider web")
- Mapping (sketch)
- Matrix scoring
- Most significant change
- Net-Map
- Non-random sampling
- Observation
- Outcome mapping
- Participatory Impact Pathways Analysis
- Participatory methods
- Performance indicators
- Photographs and video
- Problem and objectives trees
- Random sampling
- Ranking and pocket charts
- Rapid appraisal methods
- Relative scales or ladders
- Rich pictures (or mind maps)
- SWOT
- Seasonal calendars
- Semantic differentials
- Social mapping or well-being ranking
- Sociograms
- Stakeholder analysis
- Survey
- Systems (or inputs-outputs) diagram
- Theory-Based Evaluation
- Transects
- Evaluation studies and reports
- Evaluating capacity development
- Partnership
- Seminars
- Video Room
- Links to other sites
- E-learning courses
- ILAC Publications
- Contact
- Blog
Gaining from Organizational Learning Capacity
Sun, 08/31/2008 - 12:52 — Cristina Sette
Publication Type:
MiscellaneousSource:
Volume 49, Number 1 (2007)Keywords:
ILAC Newsletter; innovation performance; Organizational Learning CapabilityAbstract:
This paper examines the link between organizational learning capability (OLC) and innovation performance. Organizational learning and knowledge creation play a substantial role in innovation. Organizational learning-oriented firms should therefore have an outstanding innovation performance. While there is theoretical support for a positive link between organizational learning and firm innovation, this link needs further clarification and empirical testing. We examine whether there is a positive link between OLC and innovation performance. To test this proposition, we carried out a survey in the European Union ceramic tile sector, which is a globalised manufacturing industry. The OLC construct is based on the contextual learning conditions, and consists of five dimensions: experimentation, risk taking, interaction with the external environment, dialogue and participative decision making. The innovation performance construct focuses on product and process innovation efficacy as well as on innovation efficiency. We classified respondents according their learning orientation: more learning-oriented firms were those with an above-median OLC; less learning-oriented firms were those with an OLC below this threshold. Results reveal that more learning-oriented firms have a significantly higher innovation performance. Findings are relevant for strategic management: OLC should be taken into account when formulating firm strategy since this capability affects innovation performance, and therefore organizational results. Furthermore, the paper provides practitioners with measurement tools that could be used to audit OLC and innovation performance in a particular organizational unit.
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page