- Home
- About us
- ILAC Activities
- Resources
- ILAC Publications
- ILAC Briefs
- ILAC Sourcebook
- Part 2 - Tools and approaches
- Chapter 6: Introduction Part 2
- Chapter 7: Innovation histories
- Chapter 9: Culture study as a tool for change
- Chapter 12: Collaborative agreements
- Chapter 13: Facilitation as a foundation skill for ILAC
- Chapter 14: Learning alliances
- Chapter 15: Institutional histories
- Chapter 16: Engaging Scientists through Institutional Histories
- Chapter 18: Horizontal evaluation
- Chapter 19: Appreciative inquiry
- Part 3 - Cases and experiences
- Part 4 - Challenges and strategies
- About the authors
- Glossary
- References
- Part 2 - Tools and approaches
- Presentations by ILAC Team
- Working Papers
- Journal Articles
- Newsletter
- Reports
- ILAC Library
- Tools and methods for M&E
- Appreciative inquiry
- Biophysical measurements
- Case study
- Content analysis
- Contribution analysis
- Cost-Benefit Analysis
- Creative expression
- Diaries, journals and logs
- Dreams realised or visioning
- Expert review
- GIS mapping
- Graphing results
- Group assessment
- Historical trends and timelines
- Horizontal evaluation
- Impact evaluation
- Benefit-cost methods
- Case studies
- Cost-effectiveness analysis
- Counterfactual Impact Evaluation (CIE)
- Difference-in-difference
- Econometric methods
- Ex-post comparison of project beneficiaries with a control group
- Instrumental variables
- Integrated partial indicators
- Mathematical programming
- Modified peer review
- Partial indicators of impact
- Patent analysis
- Pipeline comparison
- Production function approach
- Propensity score matching
- Quasi-experimental design, involving the use of matched control and project groups
- Randomization
- Rapid assessment or review, conducted ex post
- Regression discontinuity design
- Simulation method
- User surveys
- Impact flow diagram
- Innovation histories
- Institutional history
- Institutional linkage diagram
- Interviews
- Learning alliances
- Learning-oriented evaluation
- M&E Frameworks
- M&E wheel (or "spider web")
- Mapping (sketch)
- Matrix scoring
- Most significant change
- Net-Map
- Non-random sampling
- Observation
- Outcome mapping
- Participatory Impact Pathways Analysis
- Participatory methods
- Performance indicators
- Photographs and video
- Problem and objectives trees
- Random sampling
- Ranking and pocket charts
- Rapid appraisal methods
- Relative scales or ladders
- Rich pictures (or mind maps)
- SWOT
- Seasonal calendars
- Semantic differentials
- Social mapping or well-being ranking
- Sociograms
- Stakeholder analysis
- Survey
- Systems (or inputs-outputs) diagram
- Theory-Based Evaluation
- Transects
- Evaluation studies and reports
- Evaluating capacity development
- Partnership
- Seminars
- Video Room
- Links to other sites
- E-learning courses
- ILAC Publications
- Contact
- Blog
Knowledge management for agricultural innovation: Lessons from networking efforts in the Bolivian Agricultural Technology System
Sun, 08/31/2008 - 12:52 — Cristina Sette
Publication Type:
Journal ArticleSource:
Knowledge Management for Development Journal, Volume 3, Number 2, p.21-37 (2007)URL:
http://journal.km4dev.org/index.php/km4dj/article/viewFile/106/174Keywords:
Bolivia; Innovation; knowledge; ResearchAbstract:
This paper presents results of an analysis of adoption of innovations among farmers affiliated to four agricultural innovation projects in Bolivia that promote different modalities of knowledge management. In two of the cases, regional foundations of the Bolivian Agricultural Technology System (SIBTA) fostered knowledge management and exchange involving multiple-agents and results show that these are relatively more successful than traditional technology transfer projects. Results of the analysis at the individual farmers' level demonstrate that the adoption of innovations is determined by the knowledge management modalities of the project to which they were affiliated to as well as by the degree of embeddedness of the farmer in local innovation and learning networks. This confirms current wisdom that farmers need intensive relations, not only to one type of extension or development agency but to many different agents, in order to be able to draw from a sufficient critical mass of knowledge, gain confidence on the relevance of the knowledge, and learn jointly to apply and improve an innovation. Those who finance and promote agricultural innovation should consider that the creation and diffusion of innovation is a complex process which can be enhanced by fostering interactive learning among farmers and other agents that dispose of and develop farm relevant knowledge.
Notes:
http://www.km4dev.org/journal/index.php/km4dj/article/viewFile/106/174
Sublibrary:
Innovation
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page