- Home
- About us
- ILAC Activities
- Resources
- ILAC Publications
- ILAC Briefs
- Working Papers
- ILAC Sourcebook
- Part 2 - Tools and approaches
- Chapter 6: Introduction Part 2
- Chapter 7: Innovation histories
- Chapter 9: Culture study as a tool for change
- Chapter 12: Collaborative agreements
- Chapter 13: Facilitation as a foundation skill for ILAC
- Chapter 14: Learning alliances
- Chapter 15: Institutional histories
- Chapter 16: Engaging Scientists through Institutional Histories
- Chapter 18: Horizontal evaluation
- Chapter 19: Appreciative inquiry
- Part 3 - Cases and experiences
- Part 4 - Challenges and strategies
- About the authors
- Glossary
- References
- Part 2 - Tools and approaches
- Reports
- Journal Articles
- Newsletter
- Presentations by ILAC Team
- ILAC Library
- Tools and methods for M&E
- Appreciative inquiry
- Biophysical measurements
- Case study
- Content analysis
- Contribution analysis
- Cost-Benefit Analysis
- Creative expression
- Diaries, journals and logs
- Dreams realised or visioning
- Expert review
- GIS mapping
- Graphing results
- Group assessment
- Historical trends and timelines
- Horizontal evaluation
- Impact evaluation
- Benefit-cost methods
- Case studies
- Cost-effectiveness analysis
- Counterfactual Impact Evaluation (CIE)
- Difference-in-difference
- Econometric methods
- Ex-post comparison of project beneficiaries with a control group
- Instrumental variables
- Integrated partial indicators
- Mathematical programming
- Modified peer review
- Partial indicators of impact
- Patent analysis
- Pipeline comparison
- Production function approach
- Propensity score matching
- Quasi-experimental design, involving the use of matched control and project groups
- Randomization
- Rapid assessment or review, conducted ex post
- Regression discontinuity design
- Simulation method
- User surveys
- Impact flow diagram
- Innovation histories
- Institutional history
- Institutional linkage diagram
- Interviews
- Learning alliances
- Learning-oriented evaluation
- M&E Frameworks
- M&E wheel (or "spider web")
- Mapping (sketch)
- Matrix scoring
- Most significant change
- Net-Map
- Non-random sampling
- Observation
- Outcome mapping
- Participatory Impact Pathways Analysis
- Participatory methods
- Performance indicators
- Photographs and video
- Problem and objectives trees
- Random sampling
- Ranking and pocket charts
- Rapid appraisal methods
- Relative scales or ladders
- Rich pictures (or mind maps)
- SWOT
- Seasonal calendars
- Semantic differentials
- Social mapping or well-being ranking
- Sociograms
- Stakeholder analysis
- Survey
- Systems (or inputs-outputs) diagram
- Theory-Based Evaluation
- Transects
- Evaluation studies and reports
- Evaluating capacity development
- Partnership
- Seminars
- Video Room
- Links to other sites
- E-learning courses
- ILAC Publications
- Contact
- Blog
Objectives
Thu, 07/31/2008 - 16:23 — Cristina Sette
ILAC’s overarching objective is to support the CGIAR Consortium and centers, the Fund Council and other stakeholders in guiding the change process more effectively by:
- helping to develop i) new types of partnerships and new models of science; ii) monitoring systems to track these partnerships; and iii) new incentives that can be offered to researchers to increase the effectiveness of their participation in innovation networks
- implementing an ideation process that will allow the Consortium, directors-general (DGs), researchers and other stakeholders to think collectively about the niches the CGIAR should occupy, the types of partnerships it should engage in and the type of science it should conduct
- drawing lessons from past experiences of organizational change and learning in the CGIAR, private firms and non-profit organizations, and participating in change processes in the Consortium and its centers (e.g., assessing methodologies to foster organizational change and facilitate access to specialized information on organizational change)
With these objectives in mind, ILAC will focus on:
- • implementing action-research projects to explore interventions that have a proven impact on the system’s performance
- • supporting the Consortium’s leadership-building effort by actively engaging stakeholders in the development of a new and compelling destination for the change process
- • promoting the exchange of valuable experiences and lessons, among centers and stakeholders, that will underpin the CGIAR change process

Photo Credit: Farmer's meeting in Congo by Jos Verhoogen (Flicker, Creative Commons)
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page