- Home
- About us
- ILAC Activities
- Resources
- ILAC Publications
- ILAC Briefs
- Working Papers
- ILAC Sourcebook
- Part 2 - Tools and approaches
- Chapter 6: Introduction Part 2
- Chapter 7: Innovation histories
- Chapter 9: Culture study as a tool for change
- Chapter 12: Collaborative agreements
- Chapter 13: Facilitation as a foundation skill for ILAC
- Chapter 14: Learning alliances
- Chapter 15: Institutional histories
- Chapter 16: Engaging Scientists through Institutional Histories
- Chapter 18: Horizontal evaluation
- Chapter 19: Appreciative inquiry
- Part 3 - Cases and experiences
- Part 4 - Challenges and strategies
- About the authors
- Glossary
- References
- Part 2 - Tools and approaches
- Reports
- Journal Articles
- Newsletter
- Presentations by ILAC Team
- ILAC Library
- Tools and methods for M&E
- Appreciative inquiry
- Biophysical measurements
- Case study
- Content analysis
- Contribution analysis
- Cost-Benefit Analysis
- Creative expression
- Diaries, journals and logs
- Dreams realised or visioning
- Expert review
- GIS mapping
- Graphing results
- Group assessment
- Historical trends and timelines
- Horizontal evaluation
- Impact evaluation
- Benefit-cost methods
- Case studies
- Cost-effectiveness analysis
- Counterfactual Impact Evaluation (CIE)
- Difference-in-difference
- Econometric methods
- Ex-post comparison of project beneficiaries with a control group
- Instrumental variables
- Integrated partial indicators
- Mathematical programming
- Modified peer review
- Partial indicators of impact
- Patent analysis
- Pipeline comparison
- Production function approach
- Propensity score matching
- Quasi-experimental design, involving the use of matched control and project groups
- Randomization
- Rapid assessment or review, conducted ex post
- Regression discontinuity design
- Simulation method
- User surveys
- Impact flow diagram
- Innovation histories
- Institutional history
- Institutional linkage diagram
- Interviews
- Learning alliances
- Learning-oriented evaluation
- M&E Frameworks
- M&E wheel (or "spider web")
- Mapping (sketch)
- Matrix scoring
- Most significant change
- Net-Map
- Non-random sampling
- Observation
- Outcome mapping
- Participatory Impact Pathways Analysis
- Participatory methods
- Performance indicators
- Photographs and video
- Problem and objectives trees
- Random sampling
- Ranking and pocket charts
- Rapid appraisal methods
- Relative scales or ladders
- Rich pictures (or mind maps)
- SWOT
- Seasonal calendars
- Semantic differentials
- Social mapping or well-being ranking
- Sociograms
- Stakeholder analysis
- Survey
- Systems (or inputs-outputs) diagram
- Theory-Based Evaluation
- Transects
- Evaluation studies and reports
- Evaluating capacity development
- Partnership
- Seminars
- Video Room
- Links to other sites
- E-learning courses
- ILAC Publications
- Contact
- Blog
Planning in Muddy Waters-Orientation for Strategic Planning in CGIAR Centers
Wed, 02/10/2010 - 14:50 — Cristina Sette
Publication Type:
Book ChapterSource:
WorldFish Center, p.34 (2003)URL:
http://www.picoteam.org/publications/pdf/Planning%20in%20Muddy%20Waters_3-2003.pdf; http://www.icarda.org/Publications/PlanninginMuddyWaters.htmKeywords:
CGIAR; ILAC Newsletter; PlanningAbstract:
This synthesis report provides the outcomes of a workshop on Strategic Planning and Priority Setting in the CGIAR. The workshop for research managers and planners was held over three days under the auspices of the Center Deputy Directors Committee of the CGIAR at WorldFish Center in Penang, Malaysia in May 2002. Participants representing eleven CGIAR centers took part in the Workshop, and fourteen centers provided background information on priority setting processes through the provision of completed questionnaires and related publications. The workshop considered the changing research and development environments in which the CGIAR Centers operate and identified the major objectives for undertaking research priority setting and strategic planning processes. Strategic planning was defined to include “visioning” and planning for regional and natural resource/commodity research and higher-level programs, whereas the Center Medium Term Plans (and annual operational plans) were considered aspects of operational planning.- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page