- Home
- About us
- ILAC Activities
- Resources
- ILAC Publications
- ILAC Briefs
- Working Papers
- ILAC Sourcebook
- Part 2 - Tools and approaches
- Chapter 6: Introduction Part 2
- Chapter 7: Innovation histories
- Chapter 9: Culture study as a tool for change
- Chapter 12: Collaborative agreements
- Chapter 13: Facilitation as a foundation skill for ILAC
- Chapter 14: Learning alliances
- Chapter 15: Institutional histories
- Chapter 16: Engaging Scientists through Institutional Histories
- Chapter 18: Horizontal evaluation
- Chapter 19: Appreciative inquiry
- Part 3 - Cases and experiences
- Part 4 - Challenges and strategies
- About the authors
- Glossary
- References
- Part 2 - Tools and approaches
- Reports
- Journal Articles
- Newsletter
- Presentations by ILAC Team
- ILAC Library
- Tools and methods for M&E
- Appreciative inquiry
- Biophysical measurements
- Case study
- Content analysis
- Contribution analysis
- Cost-Benefit Analysis
- Creative expression
- Diaries, journals and logs
- Dreams realised or visioning
- Expert review
- GIS mapping
- Graphing results
- Group assessment
- Historical trends and timelines
- Horizontal evaluation
- Impact evaluation
- Benefit-cost methods
- Case studies
- Cost-effectiveness analysis
- Counterfactual Impact Evaluation (CIE)
- Difference-in-difference
- Econometric methods
- Ex-post comparison of project beneficiaries with a control group
- Instrumental variables
- Integrated partial indicators
- Mathematical programming
- Modified peer review
- Partial indicators of impact
- Patent analysis
- Pipeline comparison
- Production function approach
- Propensity score matching
- Quasi-experimental design, involving the use of matched control and project groups
- Randomization
- Rapid assessment or review, conducted ex post
- Regression discontinuity design
- Simulation method
- User surveys
- Impact flow diagram
- Innovation histories
- Institutional history
- Institutional linkage diagram
- Interviews
- Learning alliances
- Learning-oriented evaluation
- M&E Frameworks
- M&E wheel (or "spider web")
- Mapping (sketch)
- Matrix scoring
- Most significant change
- Net-Map
- Non-random sampling
- Observation
- Outcome mapping
- Participatory Impact Pathways Analysis
- Participatory methods
- Performance indicators
- Photographs and video
- Problem and objectives trees
- Random sampling
- Ranking and pocket charts
- Rapid appraisal methods
- Relative scales or ladders
- Rich pictures (or mind maps)
- SWOT
- Seasonal calendars
- Semantic differentials
- Social mapping or well-being ranking
- Sociograms
- Stakeholder analysis
- Survey
- Systems (or inputs-outputs) diagram
- Theory-Based Evaluation
- Transects
- Evaluation studies and reports
- Evaluating capacity development
- Partnership
- Seminars
- Video Room
- Links to other sites
- E-learning courses
- ILAC Publications
- Contact
- Blog
References
Fri, 12/05/2008 - 15:23 — Cristina Sette
Argyris, C. and Schön, D.A. 1996. Organizational learning II: Theory, method, and practice. New York, USA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
Ashford, G. and Patkar, S. 2001. The Positive Path: Using Appreciative Inquiry in Rural Indian Communities. Winnipeg, Canada: International Institute for Sustainable Development. http://www.iisd.org/publications/publication.asp?pno=304)
Ashley, C. and Maxwell, S. 2001. Rethinking rural development. Development Policy Review 19(4): 395–425.
Bellanet web site: www.bellanet.org
Berdegué, J. 2001. Learning to beat Cochrane’s Treadmill: Public policy, markets and social learning in Chile’s small-scale agriculture. In: Leeuwis, C. and Pyburn, R. (eds.) Wheelbarrows Full of Frogs: Social Learning in Rural Resource Management. Wageningen, The Netherlands: Agricultural University of Wageningen.
Biggs, S. and Matsaert, H. 2004. Strengthening poverty reduction programmes using an actor-oriented approach: examples from natural resources innovation systems. Agricultural Research and Extension Network, Network Paper No. 134. London, UK: Overseas Development Institute.
Biggs, S.D. 1990. A multiple sources of innovation model of agricultural research and technology promotion. World Development 18(11): 1481–1499.
Byerlee, D. and Alex, G.E. 1998. Strengthening National Agricultural Research Systems: Policy Issues and Good Practice. Washington DC, USA: World Bank.
Campbell, B. and Hagmann, J. (2003). Rising to the challenge of poverty and environmental sustainability: Towards a conceptual and operational framework for INRM. Keynote Paper 1, Building Sustainable Livelihoods through Integrated Agricultural Research for Development, Reference Materials from the Consultative Programme Development Process for the Sub-Saharan Africa Challenge Programme. Accra, Ghana: Forum for Agricultural Research in Africa (FARA).
CGIAR Gender and Diversity Program web site: www.genderdiversity.cgiar.org
CGIAR ICT-KM Program: http://ictkm.cgiar.org/
CGIAR Knowledge Sharing web site: www.ciat.cgiar.org/cgiar/knowledge_sharing/home.htm
CGIAR System Review Secretariat, 1998. Third System Review of the CGIAR: The International Research Partnership for Food Security and Sustainable Agriculture. Washington DC, USA: Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research.
Chambers, R. 1983. Rural Development: Putting the Last First. London, UK: Longman Scientific.
Chambers, R. 2003. Preface. Agricultural Systems 78(2): 119–121.
CIAT´s Knowledge Sharing Week: http://www.ciat.cgiar.org/ks_week/index.htm
Clark, N. 2001. Innovation Systems, Institutional Change and the New Knowledge Market: Implications for third world agricultural development. UNU-INTECH Discussion Paper Series No. 2001–10. Maastricht, the Netherlands: United Nations University Institute for New Technologies.
Cooperrider, D.L., Whitney, D.L. and Stavros, J.M. 2003. The Appreciative Inquiry Handbook. San Francisco, USA: Berrett-Koehler.
Cross, R. and Parker, A. 2004. The Hidden Power of Social Networks. Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard Business School Press.
Douthwaite, B. 2002. Enabling Innovation: A practical guide to understanding and fostering technological innovation. Zed Books: London, UK.
Douthwaite, B., Kuby, T., van de Fliert, E. and Schulz, S. 2003. Impact pathway evaluation: An approach for achieving and attributing impact in complex systems. Agricultural Systems 78(2): 243–265.
Drucker, P. 1971. Men, Ideas and Politics: Essays. London, UK: Harper Collins.
Earl, S., Carden, F. and Smutylo, T., 2001. Outcome Mapping: Building Learning and Reflection into Development Programs. Ottawa, Canada: International Development Research Centre.
Edquist, C. (ed.) 1997. Systems of Innovation Approaches: Technologies, Institutions and Organizations. London, UK: Pinter, Casell Academic.
Ekboir, J. 2003. Why impact analysis should not be used for research evaluation and what the alternatives are. Agricultural Systems 78(2): 166–184.
Elliott, C.E. 1999. Locating the Energy for Change: An Introduction to Appreciative Inquiry. Winnipeg, Canada: International Institute for Sustainable Development.
Fairbanks, M. and Lindsay, S. 1999. Arando en el Mar: Fuentes ocultas de al creación de riqueza en los países en desarollo. Mexico: McGraw Hill Interamericana Editores.
Freeman, C. 1987. Technology and Economic Performance: Lessons from Japan. London, UK: Pinter.
Hall, A.J., Sulaiman, R.V., Clark, N.G., Sivamohan, M.V.K. and Yoganand, B. 2000. New agendas for agricultural research in developing countries: policy analysis and institutional implications. Knowledge, Technology and Policy 13(1): 73–91.
Hall, A.J., Sivamohan, M.V.K., Clark, N., Taylor, S. and Bockett, G. 2001. Why research partnerships really matter: Innovation theory, institutional arrangements and implications for developing new technology for the poor. World Development 29(5): 783–797.
Hall, A.J., Sulaiman, R.V., Clark, N.G. and Yoganand, B. 2003. From measuring impact to learning institutional lessons: An innovation systems perspective on improving the management of international agricultural research. Agricultural Systems 78: 213–241.
Hall, A.J., Yoganand, B., Sulaiman, R.V., Raina, R., Prasad, S., Niak, G. and Clark N.G. (eds.) 2004. Innovations in Innovation: Reflections on Partnership and Learning. Patancheru, India: International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT) and New Delhi, India: National Centre for Agricultural Economics and Policy Research (NCAP).
Head, T.C., Sorensen, P.F., Preston, J. and Yaeger, T. 2000. Is Appreciative Inquiry OD’s Philosopher’s Stone? in Cooperrider, D.L. et al. (eds.), Appreciative Inquiry: Rethinking Human Organization Toward a Positive Theory of Change. Champaign, IL, USA: Stipes Publishing, LLC.
Hewitt Associates (undated). Innovation White Paper, HR=Human Revolution. Lincolnshire, Illinois, USA. www.hewitt.com
Horton, D. and Mackay, R. (eds.) 2003. Learning for the future: Innovative approaches for evaluating agricultural research and development. Agricultural Systems 78(2): 119–336.
Horton, D. and Mackay, R. 2003. Using evaluation to enhance institutional learning and change: Recent experiences with agricultural research and development. Agricultural Systems 78: 127–142.
Horton, D., Alexaki, A., Bennett-Lartey, S., Brice, K.N., Campilan, D., Carden, F., de Souza Silva, J., Duong, L.T., Khadar, I., Maestrey Boza, A., Kayes Muniruzzam, I., Perez, J., Somarriba Chang, M., Vernooy, R. and Watts, J. 2003. Evaluating capacity development: Experiences from research and development organizations around the world. The Hague, the Netherlands: International Service for National Agricultural Research (ISNAR) and Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation (ACPEU) (CTA) and Ottawa, Canada: International Development Research Centre (IDRC).
IDRC 2005a. Examples of outcome mapping use: http://www.idrc.ca/en/ev-27705-201-1-DO_TOPIC.html
IDRC 2005b. Facilitation manual and facilitator summary sheets: http://www.idrc.ca/en/ev-62236-201-1-DO_TOPIC.html
International Development Research Centre: http://www.idrc.ca/en/ev-26968-201-1-DO_TOPIC.html
International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), 2004. The Power of Public-Private Partnerships:http://www.ilri.cgiar.org/ilripubaware/Uploaded%20Files/2004811101220.03BR_ISS_PowerOfPublic-PrivatePartnerships.htm
Iyer, K.N.S. 2002. Learning in strategic alliances: an evolutionary perspective. Academy of Marketing Science Review 10: 1–16.
Kibel, B.M. 1999. Success stories as hard data: an introduction to results mapping: http://www.pire.org/resultmapping/FIrst%20page.htm
Kleiner, A. and Roth, G. 1997. Learning Histories: A new tool for turning organizational experience into action: http://ccs.mit.edu/lh/21cwp002.html
Knowledge Sharing Project: http://www.ciat.cgiar.org/cgiar/knowledge_sharing/home.htm
Kolb, D., 2000. The Shadow Negotiation: How women can master the hidden agenda that determines bargaining success. New York, USA: Simon and Schuster.
Krebs, V. and Holley, J. 2004. Building sustainable communities through social network development. The Nonprofit Quarterly, Spring Issue.
Levine, S., 2002. The Book of Agreement: 10 essential elements for getting the results you want. San Francisco, USA: Bettett-Koehler Publishers.
Levine, S., 2004. Results Versus Protection Agreement: http://www.winstonbrill.com/bril001/html/article_index/articles601_650_body.html , link to article No. 603.
Lundvall, B.A. (ed.) 1992. National Systems of Innovation and Interactive Learning. London, UK: Pinter.
Lundy, M. (in preparation). How to Build Effective Learning Alliances: Concepts, Methods and Reflections. Cali, Colombia: Rural Innovation Institute, International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT).
Lundy, M. 2004. Learning alliances with development partners: a framework for out scaling research results. In: Pachico, D. (ed.) Scaling Up and Out: Achieving Widespread Impact Through Agricultural Research. Cali, Colombia: International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT).
Matlon, P. 2003. Foreword. Agricultural Systems 78(2): 123–125.
McElroy, M.W. 2003. The New Knowledge Management. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Knowledge Management Consortium International.
Meinzen-Dick, R., Adato, M., Haddad, L. and Hazell, P. 2004. Science and poverty: An interdisciplinary assessment of the impact of agricultural research. Washington DC, USA: International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
Mytelka, L.K. 2000. Local systems of innovation in a globalized world economy. Industry and Innovation 77(1): 15–32.
Nonaka, I. and Hirotaka, T. 1995. The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York, USA: Oxford University Press.
OECD 1997. National Innovation Systems. Paris, France: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).
Ortiz, N. 2005. From programme management to development programmes: a comparative study of results-based management and outcome mapping. Ottawa, Canada:
International Development Research Centre.
Pajek see: http://vlado.fmf.uni-lj.si/pub/networks/pajek/
Preskill, H. and Torres, R.T. 1999. Evaluative Inquiry for Learning in Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: Sage Publications.
PSO 2004. Learning Histories: A handbook for an exciting learning experience: http://www.pso.nl/asp/documentsite.asp?document=326
Roper, L. 2002. Achieving successful academic–practitioner research collaborations. Development in Practice 12 (3&4): 338–345.
Rumizen, M.C. 2002. The Complete Idiot’s Guide to Knowledge Management. Madison, USA: CWL Publishing Enterprises.
Scott, W.R. 1995. Institutions and Organizations. Thousand Oaks, USA: Sage Publications.
Senge, P., Kleiner, A., Roberts, C., Ross, R., Roth, G. and Smith, B. 1999. The Dance of Change: The challenges of sustaining momentum in learning organizations. New York, USA: Currency Doubleday.
Smutylo, T. 2001. Crouching impact, hidden attribution: overcoming threats to learning in development programs. Ottawa, Canada:
Spielman, D.J. and von Grebmer, K. 2004. Public–Private Partnerships in Agricultural Research: an analysis of challenges facing industry and the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research. Environment and Production Technology Division Discussion Paper No. 113. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.
Taracha, E. and Taylor, D. 2003. Integrated Control of East Coast Fever in Cattle of Smallholder Farmers. Nairobi, Kenya: International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI) and Edinburgh, UK: University of Edinburgh Centre for Veterinary Medicine: http://www.vet.ed.ac.uk/ctvm/AHP/ahp/electronic%201/037.pdf
Task Force on Impact Assessment and Evaluation, European Initiative for Agricultural Research for Development. 2003. Impact assessment and evaluation in agricultural research for development. Agricultural Systems 78(2): 329–336.
Toomey, G. and Russell, N. 2005. Knowledge-sharing solutions for a CGIAR without boundaries. Cali, Colombia: International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT).
von Krogh, G., Ichijo, K. and Nonaka, I. 2000. Enabling Knowledge Creation: How to unlock the mystery of tacit knowledge and release the power of innovation. New York, USA: Oxford University Press.
Watkins, J.M. and Mohr, B.J. 2001. Appreciative Inquiry: Change at the Speed of Imagination. San Francisco, USA: Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer.
Watts, J., Mackay, R., Horton, D., Hall, A., Douthwaite, B., Chambers, R. and Acosta, A. 2003. Institutional Learning and Change: An Introduction. ISNAR Discussion Paper no. 03–10. The Hague, The Netherlands: International Service for National Agricultural Research.
Whitney, D., Trosten-Bloom, A. and Cooperrider, D. 2003.
The Power of Appreciative Inquiry: A practical guide to positive change
. San Francisco, USA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers. For further information on Inflow see:
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page