- Home
- About us
- ILAC Activities
- Resources
- ILAC Publications
- ILAC Briefs
- ILAC Sourcebook
- Acknowledgement
- About the Sourcebook
- Acronyms
- Part 1 - Introduction and overview
- Part 2 - Tools and approaches
- Chapter 6: Introduction Part 2
- Chapter 7: Innovation histories
- Chapter 9: Culture study as a tool for change
- Chapter 12: Collaborative agreements
- Chapter 13: Facilitation as a foundation skill for ILAC
- Chapter 14: Learning alliances
- Chapter 15: Institutional histories
- Chapter 16: Engaging Scientists through Institutional Histories
- Chapter 18: Horizontal evaluation
- Chapter 19: Appreciative inquiry
- Part 3 - Cases and experiences
- Part 4 - Challenges and strategies
- About the authors
- Glossary
- References
- Working Papers
- Journal Articles
- Newsletter
- Reports
- ILAC Library
- Tools and methods for M&E
- Appreciative inquiry
- Biophysical measurements
- Case study
- Content analysis
- Contribution analysis
- Cost-Benefit Analysis
- Creative expression
- Diaries, journals and logs
- Dreams realised or visioning
- Expert review
- GIS mapping
- Graphing results
- Group assessment
- Historical trends and timelines
- Horizontal evaluation
- Impact evaluation
- Benefit-cost methods
- Case studies
- Cost-effectiveness analysis
- Counterfactual Impact Evaluation (CIE)
- Difference-in-difference
- Econometric methods
- Ex-post comparison of project beneficiaries with a control group
- Instrumental variables
- Integrated partial indicators
- Mathematical programming
- Modified peer review
- Partial indicators of impact
- Patent analysis
- Pipeline comparison
- Production function approach
- Propensity score matching
- Quasi-experimental design, involving the use of matched control and project groups
- Randomization
- Rapid assessment or review, conducted ex post
- Regression discontinuity design
- Simulation method
- User surveys
- Impact flow diagram
- Innovation histories
- Institutional history
- Institutional linkage diagram
- Interviews
- Learning alliances
- Learning-oriented evaluation
- M&E Frameworks
- M&E wheel (or "spider web")
- Mapping (sketch)
- Matrix scoring
- Most significant change
- Net-Map
- Non-random sampling
- Observation
- Outcome mapping
- Participatory Impact Pathways Analysis
- Participatory methods
- Performance indicators
- Photographs and video
- Problem and objectives trees
- Random sampling
- Ranking and pocket charts
- Rapid appraisal methods
- Relative scales or ladders
- Rich pictures (or mind maps)
- SWOT
- Seasonal calendars
- Semantic differentials
- Social mapping or well-being ranking
- Sociograms
- Stakeholder analysis
- Survey
- Systems (or inputs-outputs) diagram
- Theory-Based Evaluation
- Transects
- Evaluation studies and reports
- Evaluating capacity development
- Partnership
- Seminars
- Video Room
- Links to other sites
- E-learning courses
- ILAC Publications
- Contact
- Blog
Selected publications
Thu, 11/20/2008 - 09:25 — Cristina Sette
Baser, H. & P. Morgan. 2008. Capacity, change and performance. ECDPM Discussion Paper No 59B. European Centre for Development Policy Management: Maastricht, The Netherlands. 157 pages (www.ecdpm.org/dp59B).
Chen, H. 1990. Theory-driven evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Davies, R. and J. Dart. 2005. The ‘Most Significant Change’ (MSC) Technique: A Guide to Its Use. (Available on the MandE News website).
Donaldson, S. 2007. Program theory-driven evaluation science. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Engel, P., N. Keijzer & T. Land. 2007. A balanced approach to monitoring and evaluating capacity and performance: A proposal for a framework. Discussion Paper 58E. European Centre for Development Policy Management: Maastricht, The Netherlands. 17 pages (www.ecdpm.org/dp58E).
Gamble, J. 2008. A developmental evaluation primer. J.W. McConnell Family Foundation. (www.mcconnellfoundation.ca/default.aspx?Page=6&NewsID=66&lang=en-US)
Harrison, M. 2005. Diagnosing organizations. Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA.
Horton, D., R. Mackay, A. Andersen, L. Dupleich. 2000. Evaluating Capacity Development in Planning, Monitoring, and Evaluation: A case from Agricultural Research. Research Report No. 17. 102 pages (www.ifpri.org/isnararchive/Publicat/PDF/rr-17.pdf). Spanish version is Research Report No. 18 (www.ifpri.org/isnararchive/Publicat/PDF/rr-18.pdf).
Horton. 2002. Planning, implementing, and evaluating capacity development. ISNAR Briefing Paper No. 50. 8 pages (www.ifpri.org/isnararchive/publicat/bp-50.pdf ). Spanish version is BP No. 64 (www.ifpri.org/isnararchive/publicat/bp-64.pdf).
Horton et al. 2003. Developing and evaluating capacity in R&D organizations. ISNAR Briefing Paper No. 62. 8 pages. (www.ifpri.org/isnararchive/publicat/bp-62.pdf). Spanish version is BP No. 68 (www.ifpri.org/isnararchive/publicat/bp-68.pdf)
Horton, D., A. Alexaki, S. Bennet-Lartey, K. Noële Brice, D. Campilan, F. Carden, J. de Souza Silva, L. Thanh Duong, I. Khadar, A. Maestrey Boza, I, Kayes Muniruzzaman, J. Perez, M. Somarriba Chang, R. Vernooy, J. Watts. 2003. Evaluating Capacity Development: Experiences from Research and Development Organizations around the World. ISNAR, IDRC & CTA. 170 pages. (www.idrc.ca/en/ev-31556-201-1-DO_TOPIC.html). (Also available in French and Spanish.)
Horton et. al. 2003. Evaluating capacity development. ECDMP. Capacity.org. No. 17 (available in English, Spanish & French at: www.capacity.org, archive).
Horton, D., A. Alexaki, S. Bennet-Lartey, K.N. Brice, D. Campilan, F. Carden, J. de Souza Silva, L.T. Duong, I. Khadar, A. Maestrey Boza, I, Kayes Muniruzzaman, J. Perez, M. Somarriba Chang, R. Vernooy, J. Watts. 2003. Developing and Evaluating Capacity in Research and Development Organizations. Briefing Paper No. 62. International Service for National Agricultural Research (www.ifpri.org/isnararchive/publicat/bp-62.pdf)
Lusthaus, C. M. H. Adrien, G. Anderson, F. Carden & G. Montalvan. 2002. Organizational assessment: a framework for improving performance. Washington, D.C. and Ottawa, Canada: Inter-American Development Bank and IDRC.
Mackay, R. and D. Horton (2002). Capacity development in planning, monitoring and evaluation. ISNAR Briefing Paper No. 51. 8 pages. (www.ifpri.org/isnararchive/publicat/bp-51.pdf ). Spanish version is BP No. 65: www.ifpri.org/isnararchive/publicat/bp-65.pdf)
Mayne, J. 2001. Addressing attribution through contribution analysis: using performance measures sensibly. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation (Vol. 16 No. 1).
Patton, M. Q. 2008. Utilization-focused evaluation. Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA.
Patton, M.Q. 2002. Utilization-focused evaluation (U-FE) checklist. Evaluation Checklists Project. www.wmich.edu/evalctr/checklists.
Patton, M.Q. 1999. Utilization-Focused Evaluation for Africa. (drawn from evaluation training lectures delivered at the Inaugural Conference of the African Evaluation Association, 13-17 September, 1999, Nairobi, Kenya. Edited by Prudence Nkinda Chaiban and Mahesh Patel and abridged by Doug Horton (Original available at: http://www.geocities.com/afreval/documents/training.htm).
Preskill, H. & D. Russ-Eft. 2005. Building evaluation capacity: 72 activitiesw for teaching and training. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: Sage Publications.
Preskill, H. & R. Torres. 1999. Evaluative inquiry for learning in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: Sage Publications.
Rogers, P. 2008. Using programme theory to evaluate complicated and complex aspects of interventions. Evaluation (Vol. 14, No. 1)
Russ-Eft, D. and H. Preskill. 2001. Evaluation in organizations: a systematic approach to enhancing learning, performance, and change. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Perseus Publishing. (Appendix A: The readiness for organizational learning and evaluation instrument (ROLE).
Svitakova, J., Kosina, P., and La Rovere, R. 2009. Impacts of CIMMYT’s FormalInternational Training Activities Linked to Long-Term Trials in the Field of Conservation Agriculture:1996-2006. Mexico, DF.: CIMMYT. http://www.cimmyt.org/english/docs/impacts/impactstrainingca.pdf
Thiele, G., A. Devaux, C. Velasco, and D. Horton. 2007. Horizontal Evaluation: Fostering Knowledge Sharing and Program Improvement within a Network. American Journal of Evaluation (28,4) Pp. 493-508.
Torres, R., H. Preskill & M. Piontek. 2005. Evaluation strategies for communicating and reporting. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: Sage Publications.
Yin, R. 2003. Case study research. Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA.