- Home
- About us
- ILAC Activities
- Resources
- ILAC Publications
- ILAC Briefs
- ILAC Sourcebook
- Part 2 - Tools and approaches
- Chapter 6: Introduction Part 2
- Chapter 7: Innovation histories
- Chapter 9: Culture study as a tool for change
- Chapter 12: Collaborative agreements
- Chapter 13: Facilitation as a foundation skill for ILAC
- Chapter 14: Learning alliances
- Chapter 15: Institutional histories
- Chapter 16: Engaging Scientists through Institutional Histories
- Chapter 18: Horizontal evaluation
- Chapter 19: Appreciative inquiry
- Part 3 - Cases and experiences
- Part 4 - Challenges and strategies
- About the authors
- Glossary
- References
- Part 2 - Tools and approaches
- Presentations by ILAC Team
- Working Papers
- Journal Articles
- Newsletter
- Reports
- ILAC Library
- Tools and methods for M&E
- Appreciative inquiry
- Biophysical measurements
- Case study
- Content analysis
- Contribution analysis
- Cost-Benefit Analysis
- Creative expression
- Diaries, journals and logs
- Dreams realised or visioning
- Expert review
- GIS mapping
- Graphing results
- Group assessment
- Historical trends and timelines
- Horizontal evaluation
- Impact evaluation
- Benefit-cost methods
- Case studies
- Cost-effectiveness analysis
- Counterfactual Impact Evaluation (CIE)
- Difference-in-difference
- Econometric methods
- Ex-post comparison of project beneficiaries with a control group
- Instrumental variables
- Integrated partial indicators
- Mathematical programming
- Modified peer review
- Partial indicators of impact
- Patent analysis
- Pipeline comparison
- Production function approach
- Propensity score matching
- Quasi-experimental design, involving the use of matched control and project groups
- Randomization
- Rapid assessment or review, conducted ex post
- Regression discontinuity design
- Simulation method
- User surveys
- Impact flow diagram
- Innovation histories
- Institutional history
- Institutional linkage diagram
- Interviews
- Learning alliances
- Learning-oriented evaluation
- M&E Frameworks
- M&E wheel (or "spider web")
- Mapping (sketch)
- Matrix scoring
- Most significant change
- Net-Map
- Non-random sampling
- Observation
- Outcome mapping
- Participatory Impact Pathways Analysis
- Participatory methods
- Performance indicators
- Photographs and video
- Problem and objectives trees
- Random sampling
- Ranking and pocket charts
- Rapid appraisal methods
- Relative scales or ladders
- Rich pictures (or mind maps)
- SWOT
- Seasonal calendars
- Semantic differentials
- Social mapping or well-being ranking
- Sociograms
- Stakeholder analysis
- Survey
- Systems (or inputs-outputs) diagram
- Theory-Based Evaluation
- Transects
- Evaluation studies and reports
- Evaluating capacity development
- Partnership
- Seminars
- Video Room
- Links to other sites
- E-learning courses
- ILAC Publications
- Contact
- Blog
Shaping International Evaluation: A 30-Year Journey
Fri, 02/11/2011 - 14:10 — Cristina Sette
Publication Type:
BookSource:
UNIVERSALIA, Montreal and Ottawa, Canada (2010)Keywords:
capacity development; Evaluation; gender; ICT; parternship; results-basedAbstract:
The book has two main sections. The first deals with major trends that have influenced international evaluation, and begins with Peter Morgan’s thoughts on capacity development, a dominant theme in development agencies, but as Peter points out, a hollow theme in international agreements, and one whose fuzziness creates great issues for the evaluator. Ken Stephenson follows with his analysis of Results-Based Management, another major influence on international evaluation. Born in the same timeframe as Universalia was created, RBM supported the rising tide of conservatism espoused at the time by Margaret Thatcher in the UK and Ronald Reagan in the USA. However, like the context in which it arose, RBM has limitations in practice. The following chapter deals with another strong international development influence, “partnerships”. Charles Lusthaus, Katherine Garven, and Silvia Grandi have recently conducted substantive work in this area, so Chapter 4 enables them to share what they have learned. Finally, in response to the limitations of a “project” mentality, and in recognition of the importance of developing organizations and institutions, in Chapter 5, Katrina Rojas and Charles Lusthaus consider how such structures are evaluated. This is a lasting contribution of Universalia’s work over more than two decades, and provides a logical conclusion to the first main section. The second substantive section considers the evolution of evaluation within specific sectors. We admit that the choice of sectors was largely arbitrary, but has worked out well. From the days of the Colombo Plan, agriculture has been seen as key to international development, so we begin the second section with Ronald Mackay and Doug Horton’s chapter on evaluation related to agricultural systems. It is perhaps fair to say that these authors have long been ahead of thinking in the field they evaluate, so they are ideal candidates to share their insights. Nowadays, environment is an important theme in development circles, and we are pleased to have Ramon Pérez Gil share his insights on the evolution of environment as a dominant international force as well as trends in evaluating environmental impact. Two additional “sectors” are included, Information and Communication Technology (ICT) and Gender Mainstreaming. Ricardo Gomez and Shaun Pather look at ICT, a new, dynamic, and exceedingly important theme in our modern world, while Katherine Garven, Katrina Rojas, Anette Wenderoth, and Elisabetta Micaro consider trends in gender mainstreaming and the evaluation response. We conclude the second section with Doha Abdelhamid’s insights on development in general, and particularly developing evaluation capacities in the Middle East and North Africa. That contribution nicely melds the concepts of capacity, organizational development, and the dominant themes of the book.Notes:
Edited BookSublibrary:
Evaluation
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page