Institutional Learning and Change Initiative

Keywords:

case studies; ILAC Newsletter; Impact; Innovation; Innovation capacity; research uptake

Abstract:

In the current climate of rapid change pressures on researchers to achieve greater impact are increasing. Use of an innovation systems framework is seen as a means of addressing these issues. However, social and biological scientists often conceptualise issues in different ways and biological scientists sometimes find it difficult to relate social science theories to practice. Cases representing practical examples of what it might mean to use innovation systems interventions and recognize key features are presented. Four cases represent actions facilitating uptake of research outputs including; a crop pest bio-control method; post harvest management of coffee; isolation and commercialization of an indigenous seed variety and; a community based system to forecast armyworm plagues. Case 5 addresses an initiative to build capacity to respond to emerging crop health challenges on an on-going basis. Key features influencing project activities and interventions contributing to success are summarized. The project concludes a) innovation systems features and interventions can be recognized in research uptake projects b) a new attitude to failures is needed if we are to learn from failure and c) research organisations may prioritise activities addressing research uptake over innovation capacity d) nevertheless scientists can play an important role in improving innovation capacity directly.