- Home
- About us
- ILAC Activities
- Resources
- ILAC Publications
- ILAC Briefs
- Working Papers
- ILAC Sourcebook
- Part 2 - Tools and approaches
- Chapter 6: Introduction Part 2
- Chapter 7: Innovation histories
- Chapter 9: Culture study as a tool for change
- Chapter 12: Collaborative agreements
- Chapter 13: Facilitation as a foundation skill for ILAC
- Chapter 14: Learning alliances
- Chapter 15: Institutional histories
- Chapter 16: Engaging Scientists through Institutional Histories
- Chapter 18: Horizontal evaluation
- Chapter 19: Appreciative inquiry
- Part 3 - Cases and experiences
- Part 4 - Challenges and strategies
- About the authors
- Glossary
- References
- Part 2 - Tools and approaches
- Reports
- Journal Articles
- Newsletter
- Presentations by ILAC Team
- ILAC Library
- Tools and methods for M&E
- Appreciative inquiry
- Biophysical measurements
- Case study
- Content analysis
- Contribution analysis
- Cost-Benefit Analysis
- Creative expression
- Diaries, journals and logs
- Dreams realised or visioning
- Expert review
- GIS mapping
- Graphing results
- Group assessment
- Historical trends and timelines
- Horizontal evaluation
- Impact evaluation
- Benefit-cost methods
- Case studies
- Cost-effectiveness analysis
- Counterfactual Impact Evaluation (CIE)
- Difference-in-difference
- Econometric methods
- Ex-post comparison of project beneficiaries with a control group
- Instrumental variables
- Integrated partial indicators
- Mathematical programming
- Modified peer review
- Partial indicators of impact
- Patent analysis
- Pipeline comparison
- Production function approach
- Propensity score matching
- Quasi-experimental design, involving the use of matched control and project groups
- Randomization
- Rapid assessment or review, conducted ex post
- Regression discontinuity design
- Simulation method
- User surveys
- Impact flow diagram
- Innovation histories
- Institutional history
- Institutional linkage diagram
- Interviews
- Learning alliances
- Learning-oriented evaluation
- M&E Frameworks
- M&E wheel (or "spider web")
- Mapping (sketch)
- Matrix scoring
- Most significant change
- Net-Map
- Non-random sampling
- Observation
- Outcome mapping
- Participatory Impact Pathways Analysis
- Participatory methods
- Performance indicators
- Photographs and video
- Problem and objectives trees
- Random sampling
- Ranking and pocket charts
- Rapid appraisal methods
- Relative scales or ladders
- Rich pictures (or mind maps)
- SWOT
- Seasonal calendars
- Semantic differentials
- Social mapping or well-being ranking
- Sociograms
- Stakeholder analysis
- Survey
- Systems (or inputs-outputs) diagram
- Theory-Based Evaluation
- Transects
- Evaluation studies and reports
- Evaluating capacity development
- Partnership
- Seminars
- Video Room
- Links to other sites
- E-learning courses
- ILAC Publications
- Contact
- Blog
WFP working with NGOs: A framework for partnership
Sun, 08/31/2008 - 12:52 — Cristina Sette
Publication Type:
Conference PaperSource:
World Food Programme. Executive Board, Annual Sess, 21-24 May 2001, World Food Programme, Rome, Italy (2001)Keywords:
DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS; FOOD AID; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; NONGOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS; partnership; partnerships; Planning; Training; WFPAbstract:
WFP depends on collaboration with partners to complement food aid with technical and non-food inputs. Currently WFP works with more than 1,100 non-governmental organizations (NGOs), and each relationship is reflective of the country-specific operational context, in particular the timing and nature of the food aid operation and national governments' views of NGOs. WFP recognizes the importance of longer-term partnerships, as evident in its 16 Memoranda of Understanding that outline strategic ways of working with its NGO partners. Working in partnership is one important way. A partnership is defined here as a mutually beneficial alliance between organizations where roles, responsibilities and accountabilities are clearly defined. These relationships are based on a shared vision regarding objectives and purpose of work. They involve joint resource contributions, shared risks and joint control of information. This paper builds on lessons learned to identify key elements in a WFP-NGO partnership framework. It proposes capacity-building, advocacy and other measures related to establishing effective partnerships, with a particular focus on strengthening relationships with local NGOs. Draft Decision The Board took note of the review of WFP's NGO partnerships contained in document WFP/EB.A/2001/4-B, prepared as a response to a request made at the Board's First Regular Session, 2000, and approved the recommendations on how such partnerships should be pursued, contained therein.
Sublibrary:
Partnership
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page