- Home
- About us
- ILAC Activities
- Resources
- ILAC Publications
- ILAC Briefs
- Working Papers
- ILAC Sourcebook
- Part 2 - Tools and approaches
- Chapter 6: Introduction Part 2
- Chapter 7: Innovation histories
- Chapter 9: Culture study as a tool for change
- Chapter 12: Collaborative agreements
- Chapter 13: Facilitation as a foundation skill for ILAC
- Chapter 14: Learning alliances
- Chapter 15: Institutional histories
- Chapter 16: Engaging Scientists through Institutional Histories
- Chapter 18: Horizontal evaluation
- Chapter 19: Appreciative inquiry
- Part 3 - Cases and experiences
- Part 4 - Challenges and strategies
- About the authors
- Glossary
- References
- Part 2 - Tools and approaches
- Reports
- Journal Articles
- Newsletter
- Presentations by ILAC Team
- ILAC Library
- Tools and methods for M&E
- Appreciative inquiry
- Biophysical measurements
- Case study
- Content analysis
- Contribution analysis
- Cost-Benefit Analysis
- Creative expression
- Diaries, journals and logs
- Dreams realised or visioning
- Expert review
- GIS mapping
- Graphing results
- Group assessment
- Historical trends and timelines
- Horizontal evaluation
- Impact evaluation
- Benefit-cost methods
- Case studies
- Cost-effectiveness analysis
- Counterfactual Impact Evaluation (CIE)
- Difference-in-difference
- Econometric methods
- Ex-post comparison of project beneficiaries with a control group
- Instrumental variables
- Integrated partial indicators
- Mathematical programming
- Modified peer review
- Partial indicators of impact
- Patent analysis
- Pipeline comparison
- Production function approach
- Propensity score matching
- Quasi-experimental design, involving the use of matched control and project groups
- Randomization
- Rapid assessment or review, conducted ex post
- Regression discontinuity design
- Simulation method
- User surveys
- Impact flow diagram
- Innovation histories
- Institutional history
- Institutional linkage diagram
- Interviews
- Learning alliances
- Learning-oriented evaluation
- M&E Frameworks
- M&E wheel (or "spider web")
- Mapping (sketch)
- Matrix scoring
- Most significant change
- Net-Map
- Non-random sampling
- Observation
- Outcome mapping
- Participatory Impact Pathways Analysis
- Participatory methods
- Performance indicators
- Photographs and video
- Problem and objectives trees
- Random sampling
- Ranking and pocket charts
- Rapid appraisal methods
- Relative scales or ladders
- Rich pictures (or mind maps)
- SWOT
- Seasonal calendars
- Semantic differentials
- Social mapping or well-being ranking
- Sociograms
- Stakeholder analysis
- Survey
- Systems (or inputs-outputs) diagram
- Theory-Based Evaluation
- Transects
- Evaluation studies and reports
- Evaluating capacity development
- Partnership
- Seminars
- Video Room
- Links to other sites
- E-learning courses
- ILAC Publications
- Contact
- Blog
Monitoring the evolution of collaborations: Making research more effective
Approach
Interdisciplinary, multi-institutional and multi-actor innovation networks are needed for poverty-reducing research to have the maximum impact.
ILAC and the CGIAR Research Program (CRP) on Roots, Tubers and Banana (RTB) have engaged in a partnership to develop a project called "Partnerships and Knowledge Sharing for Innovation in Roots, Tubers and Banana Research for Development".
Through the study of a network called "CIALCA", the project will support priority setting and exploration of new models of research and partnerships in the RTB CRP by
- analyzing the evolution and current state of its partnerships and research routines;
- identifying actions that can increase its contribution to the SLOs; and
- exploring strategies that can facilitate knowledge sharing, capacity development and collective learning in the partnership.
By interacting closely with researchers and coordination of the MUSA network, the project will foster buy-in and utilization of its results, which are also expected to be useful for the RTB and other CRPs.
Tue, 11/20/2012 - 11:15 — Cristina Sette
In preparation for the Global Conference on Agricultural Research for Development (GCARD) 2012, the Global Forum on Agricultural Research (GFAR) and ILAC conducted an inventory of forward thinking activities in agriculture and rural development; maily in three main topics: land use, production and consumption, and farminig patters.
As part of the inventory, a series of recent forward thinking studies were identified, analyzed and selected to be further developed into four-page briefs.
The briefs were produced during three 'writeshops' conducted in Rome, Bangkok and San Jose. These briefs, in English, Spanish and Portuguese languages can be found at http://www.egfar.org/content/foresight-write-workshops.
Tue, 11/25/2008 - 13:54 — Cristina Sette
What is BetterEvaluation?
BetterEvaluation is an international collaboration to improve evaluation. BetterEvaluation is designed to support practitioners to share their knowledge and experience to take the field forward and develop fresh, innovative, and novel approaches to evaluation.
At the heart of the project is an interactive web-based platform about evaluation methods and approaches that supports evaluators and evaluation commissioners to choose the most appropriate combinations of evaluation approaches and methods, and to implement these methods well.
The platform can be accessed at www.betterevaluation.org
Mon, 09/12/2011 - 11:31 — Cristina Sette
Interview with Javier Ekboir, ILAC coordinator (in Spanish with subtitles in English)
After a field trip to the Cañete River Basin in Peru, Javier Ekboir talked with us about his impressions about what he saw, the rural dynamics he could perceive and some common aspects he found with other places in the world. Pay attention about his interesting thoughts about how globalization could be an opportunity for some cultures, but also a problem for some populations.
Most changes in the CGIAR have occurred in a decentralized manner and few lessons have been drawn from these various experiences. To change in a more deliberate way, the CGIAR needs to develop the capacity to use adaptive management approaches (i.e., to learn during implementation and adapt the strategies as problems and opportunities emerge). To learn how to develop this capacity, ILAC has teamed up with the CGIAR Challenge Program on Water and Food (CPWF) to try out a structure for decentralized experimentation with centralized learning.
Tue, 07/22/2008 - 22:45 — web10
Mayne, J. (2012) Making causal claims. ILAC Brief No. 26. Rome, Institutional Learning and Change (ILAC) Initiative
Horton, D., Prain, G., Thiele, G. (2010) Perspectives on Partnership: Highlights of a Literature Review. ILAC Brief No. 25. Rome, Institutional Learning and Change (ILAC) Initiative