- Home
- About us
- ILAC Activities
- Resources
- ILAC Publications
- ILAC Briefs
- ILAC Sourcebook
- Part 2 - Tools and approaches
- Chapter 6: Introduction Part 2
- Chapter 7: Innovation histories
- Chapter 9: Culture study as a tool for change
- Chapter 12: Collaborative agreements
- Chapter 13: Facilitation as a foundation skill for ILAC
- Chapter 14: Learning alliances
- Chapter 15: Institutional histories
- Chapter 16: Engaging Scientists through Institutional Histories
- Chapter 18: Horizontal evaluation
- Chapter 19: Appreciative inquiry
- Part 3 - Cases and experiences
- Part 4 - Challenges and strategies
- About the authors
- Glossary
- References
- Part 2 - Tools and approaches
- Presentations by ILAC Team
- Working Papers
- Journal Articles
- Newsletter
- Reports
- ILAC Library
- Tools and methods for M&E
- Appreciative inquiry
- Biophysical measurements
- Case study
- Content analysis
- Contribution analysis
- Cost-Benefit Analysis
- Creative expression
- Diaries, journals and logs
- Dreams realised or visioning
- Expert review
- GIS mapping
- Graphing results
- Group assessment
- Historical trends and timelines
- Horizontal evaluation
- Impact evaluation
- Benefit-cost methods
- Case studies
- Cost-effectiveness analysis
- Counterfactual Impact Evaluation (CIE)
- Difference-in-difference
- Econometric methods
- Ex-post comparison of project beneficiaries with a control group
- Instrumental variables
- Integrated partial indicators
- Mathematical programming
- Modified peer review
- Partial indicators of impact
- Patent analysis
- Pipeline comparison
- Production function approach
- Propensity score matching
- Quasi-experimental design, involving the use of matched control and project groups
- Randomization
- Rapid assessment or review, conducted ex post
- Regression discontinuity design
- Simulation method
- User surveys
- Impact flow diagram
- Innovation histories
- Institutional history
- Institutional linkage diagram
- Interviews
- Learning alliances
- Learning-oriented evaluation
- M&E Frameworks
- M&E wheel (or "spider web")
- Mapping (sketch)
- Matrix scoring
- Most significant change
- Net-Map
- Non-random sampling
- Observation
- Outcome mapping
- Participatory Impact Pathways Analysis
- Participatory methods
- Performance indicators
- Photographs and video
- Problem and objectives trees
- Random sampling
- Ranking and pocket charts
- Rapid appraisal methods
- Relative scales or ladders
- Rich pictures (or mind maps)
- SWOT
- Seasonal calendars
- Semantic differentials
- Social mapping or well-being ranking
- Sociograms
- Stakeholder analysis
- Survey
- Systems (or inputs-outputs) diagram
- Theory-Based Evaluation
- Transects
- Evaluation studies and reports
- Evaluating capacity development
- Partnership
- Seminars
- Video Room
- Links to other sites
- E-learning courses
- ILAC Publications
- Contact
- Blog
Mon, 09/12/2011 - 11:31 — Cristina Sette
Interview with Javier Ekboir, ILAC coordinator (in Spanish with subtitles in English)
After a field trip to the Cañete River Basin in Peru, Javier Ekboir talked with us about his impressions about what he saw, the rural dynamics he could perceive and some common aspects he found with other places in the world. Pay attention about his interesting thoughts about how globalization could be an opportunity for some cultures, but also a problem for some populations.
Wed, 09/07/2011 - 15:43 — Cristina Sette
ILAC, through its project called BetterEvaluation, in partnership with RMIT, ODI and Pact, and funded by IFAD and Rockefeller Foundation, participated and co-sponsored a series of activities at the 3rd Biennial South African Monitoring and Evaluation Association (SAMEA) Conference in Johannesburg (5-9 September 2011).
The activities included:
• One-day pre-conference workshop on BetterEvaluation
• Exhibit booth
• Sponsor the Conference Welcome and Cocktail
• Paper Session
• Lunch Session
Tue, 02/22/2011 - 09:17 — Cristina Sette
News from the ILAC Initiative:
ILAC’s New Mission
Following the recent changes in the CGIAR, ILAC adapted its mission and strategy to better contribute to the change process. The ILAC initiative continues to foster learning from experience and use of the lessons learned to improve the design and implementation of agricultural research and development programs; however, our future work will emphasize helping the CGIAR Consortium Office and the Centers to develop new ways of partnership and research models, and by creating a space for reflection on the future of the CGIAR.
ILAC’s strategy detailing the actions to be implemented to reach these goals has been recently published and can be found in http://www.cgiar-ilac.org/files/ideas_for_change_ilac_17feb.pdf .
Most changes in the CGIAR have occurred in a decentralized manner and few lessons have been drawn from these various experiences. To change in a more deliberate way, the CGIAR needs to develop the capacity to use adaptive management approaches (i.e., to learn during implementation and adapt the strategies as problems and opportunities emerge). To learn how to develop this capacity, ILAC has teamed up with the CGIAR Challenge Program on Water and Food (CPWF) to try out a structure for decentralized experimentation with centralized learning.
Tue, 11/25/2008 - 13:54 — Cristina Sette
What is BetterEvaluation?
BetterEvaluation is an international collaboration to improve evaluation. BetterEvaluation is designed to support practitioners to share their knowledge and experience to take the field forward and develop fresh, innovative, and novel approaches to evaluation.
At the heart of the project is an interactive web-based platform about evaluation methods and approaches that supports evaluators and evaluation commissioners to choose the most appropriate combinations of evaluation approaches and methods, and to implement these methods well.
Tue, 07/22/2008 - 22:45 — web10
Horton, D., Prain, G., Thiele, G. (2010) Perspectives on Partnership: Highlights of a Literature Review. ILAC Brief No. 25. Rome, Institutional Learning and Change (ILAC) Initiative
Whitty, B. (2010) An accountability framework for technological innovation. ILAC Brief No. 24. Rome, Institutional Learning and Change (ILAC) Initiative
Mon, 01/16/2012 - 13:14 — Cristina Sette
Through the Global Forum on Agricultural Research (GFAR), an inventory by means of electronic media is now being launched. This inventory aims to identify and record forward-thinking activities that have been developed, in a systematic and documented way, on issues related to agriculture, rural development and farming systems for the next 10-20 years.
This inventory should help identify a) individuals and organizations that are or have recently been engaged in such forward-thinking activities and b) what future scenarios were envisaged. It is open to anyone who has engaged in this type of activity over the past five years. It is produced in seven languages (Arabic, Chinese, English, French, Portuguese, Russian and Spanish) to provide an opportunity for more people to participate.
- Cristina Sette's blog
- Login or register to post comments
- Read more
Thu, 09/22/2011 - 07:59 — Cristina Sette
The Institutional Learning and Change (ILAC) Initiative of the CGIAR, in partnership with WFP, FAO and IFAD, organized a worskhop on evaluation in Rome, at FAO, on 19 September 2011.
This workshop aimed to generate some discussions on complexity and evaluation methods, as well as provide an opportunity for evaluators based in Rome to interact with one another.
The one day program had three main parts:
Thu, 05/28/2009 - 14:07 — Cristina Sette
The ILAC Initiative aims to increase the contribution of the CGIAR to poverty alleviation by improving planning, monitoring and evaluation of collaborative agricultural research for development. ILAC contributes specifically by:
- Building capacity
- Providing technical support to scientists and managers
- Mobilizing funds and resources
- Facilitating knowledge sharing
- Influencing research and development policies to promote institutional learning and change
A document containing ILAC contributions to Bioversity International, its host, is attached below.