| Keyword |
Citation |
|
Food-crop biotech
|
Ayele, S., J. Chataway, et al. (2006). "Partnerships in African crop biotech." Nature Biotechnology 24(6): 619-621.
(copyright protected)
|
|
Fair trade
|
Barrientos, S. and S. Smith (2006). The ETI code of Labour Practice: Do workers really benefit? Summary of an Independent Assessment for the Ethical Trading Initiative. Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex.
|
|
Fair trade
|
Barrientos, S. and S. Smith (2007). "Do workers benefit from ethical trade? Assessing codes of labour practice in global production systems." Third World Quarterly 28(4): 713-729.
(copyright protected)
|
|
Fair trade
|
Barrientos, S. and S. Smith (2007). Mainstreaming Fair Trade in global production networks: Own brand fruit and chocolate in UK supermarkets. Fair Trade: The challenge of transforming globalization. L. T. Raynolds, D. Murray and J. Wilkinson. London and New York, Routledge. Chapter 7: 102-122.
(copyright protected)
|
|
Case study; positive changes; policy influence
|
Biggs, S. (2007). "Reflections on the Social Embeddedness of S&T in Rural and Agricultural Transformation: Learning from positive experiences of poverty reduction and social inclusion in Nepal." Studies in Nepali History and Society 12(2): 251-282.
(copyright protected)
|
|
Innovation systems
|
de Haan, N. C., D. Romney, et al. (2006). "Feeding livestock through partnerships." Knowledge Management for Development Journal 2(3): 123-135. |
|
Innovation systems; agricultural research
|
Gandarillas, A., J. Blajos, et al. (2007). "Changing paradigms for organising R&D: agricultural research and the creation of the PROINPA Foundation in Bolivia." International Journal of Agricultural Resources, Governance and Ecology 6(2): 256-276.
(copyright protected)
|
|
Agreements; intellectual property rights
|
Henson-Apollonio, V. (2005). Collaborative Agreements: A ‘how to’ guide. ILAC Brief No. 4. Rome, Institutional Learning and Change Initiative. |
|
Literature review
|
Horton, D., G. Prain, et al. (2009). Perspectives on partnership: A literature review. Social Sciences Working Paper No 3. Lima, Peru, International Potato Center (CIP). |
|
Lessons
|
ILAC (2010). Partnering in International Agricultural Research for Development: Lessons from the ILAC Learning Laboratory. ILAC Working Paper No 10. Rome, Institutional Learning and Change Initiative. |
|
Policy
|
ILRI (2008). ILRI’s Partnership Strategy and Management System. Nairobi, Kenya, International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI). |
|
Collaboration
|
Kaner, S., J. Watts, et al. (2008). Participatory decision-making: The core of multi-stakeholder collaboration. ILAC Brief No. 19. Rome, Institutional Learning and Change Initiative. |
|
Innovation; communication
|
Kristjanson, P., R. S. Reid, et al. (2009). "Linking international agricultural research knowledge with action for sustainable development." Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (PNAS) 106(3). |
|
Lessons; private sector
|
Nelson, J. and D. Prescott (2005). Partnering for Success: Business Perspectives on Multistakeholder Partnerships. Geneva, World Economic Forum Global Corporate Citizenship Initiative (GCCI), in cooperation with IBLF - The Prince of Wales International Business Leaders Forum and JFK School of Government, Harvard University. |
|
Fair trade
|
Raynolds, L. T., D. Murray, et al., Eds. (2007). Fair Trade: The challenge of transforming globalization. London and New York, Routledge.
(copyright protected)
|
|
Innovation capacity; case studies; research uptake; impact
|
Romney, D., N. Efa, et al. (2009). Use of practical examples from CABI, a science based organization, to illustrate how more impact may be gained from research based knowledge. Innovation Asia-Pacific Symposium. Kathmandu, Nepal. |
|
Fair trade
|
Smith, A. (1998). Moving Beyond Banana Trade Wars, 1993-96: Mediation in Solidarity for Sustainability. Mediating Sustainability: Growing Policy from the Grassroots. J. Blauert and S. Zadek. West Hartford, Kumarian Press. Chapter 5.
(copyright protected)
|
|
Pro-poor innovation; public–private partnerships
|
Spielman, D., F. Hartwich, et al. (2007). Public–Private Partnerships in International Agricultural Research. Research Brief No 9. Washington, DC, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). |
|
Agricultural R&D, CGIAR, innovation, public–private partnerships
|
Spielman, D., F. Hartwich, et al. (2007). Sharing Science, Building Bridges, and Enhancing Impact: Public–Private Partnerships in the CGIAR. IFPRI Discussion Paper 708. Washington, DC, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). |
|
Partnerships for Sustainability; case study
|
Vollmer, D. (2009). Enhancing the Effectiveness of Sustainability Partnerships: Summary of a Workshop. Washington DC, National Academy of Sciences. |
|
Accountability; policy
|
Whitty, B. (2008). Accountability Principles for Research Organisations. London, One World Trust. |
